Equation connecting potential and potential energy of a distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equations for calculating potential energy in electric charge distributions, specifically highlighting the relationship between potential energy and electric potential. The first equation presented allows for the calculation of potential energy from the electric field, while the second equation connects potential energy to charge density and electric potential. A derivation method using vector calculus identities, particularly a product rule, is discussed to relate these equations. The identity used is recognized as a product rule in vector calculus, facilitating the derivation process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the mathematical connections between electric fields, potential energy, and potential.
Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
The equation below allows us to calculate the potential energy of a continuous distribution of electric charge.
$$U=\frac {\epsilon_0} 2 \iiint\limits_\text{Entire electric field}\vec E^2\,dV$$
In my textbook, the author states
$$U=\frac 1 {8\pi\epsilon_0}\iiint\limits_\text{Entire electric field}\rho\phi\, dV$$
which relates the potential energy of the distribution to its electric potential. I wonder how it is derived from the first equation.

Edit: It looks like the equation is actually a special case of the following formula for a discrete configuration of charges:
$$U=\frac 1{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac 1 2\sum_{j=1}^Nq_j\sum_{k\neq j}\frac{q_k}{r_{jk}}$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The trick is to write ##\displaystyle{\int} E^2 dV = - \displaystyle{\int} \mathbf{E} \cdot \nabla \phi dV = -\displaystyle{\int}\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E} \phi) dV + \displaystyle{\int} \phi \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} dV##, where the integral is taken over all space. The first term vanishes by Gauss' theorem since ##\mathbf{E}## is zero at infinity.
 
  • Love
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics, Leo Liu and Delta2
ergospherical said:
The trick is to write ##\displaystyle{\int} E^2 dV = - \displaystyle{\int} \mathbf{E} \cdot \nabla \phi dV = -\displaystyle{\int}\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E} \phi) dV + \displaystyle{\int} \phi \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} dV##, where the integral is taken over all space. The first term vanishes by Gauss' theorem since ##\mathbf{E}## is zero at infinity.
Can you tell me what the indentity $$\vec E\cdot\nabla\phi=\nabla\cdot(\vec E\phi)+\phi\nabla\cdot\vec E$$ is called? I am not very familiar with the del operator. Ty!
 
In suffix notation (with the ##x_i## Cartesian coordinates),\begin{align*}
\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E} \phi) = \sum_i \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \left( E_i \phi \right) &= \sum_i \phi \dfrac{\partial E_i}{\partial x_i} + \sum_i E_i \dfrac{\partial \phi}{\partial x_i} \\

&= \phi \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{E} \cdot \nabla \phi
\end{align*}
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Delta2 and Leo Liu
  • Like
Likes Leo Liu and Delta2
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top