Equation connecting potential and potential energy of a distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the potential energy equation for a continuous distribution of electric charge, specifically the equation $$U=\frac {\epsilon_0} 2 \iiint\limits_\text{Entire electric field}\vec E^2\,dV$$ and its relation to $$U=\frac 1 {8\pi\epsilon_0}\iiint\limits_\text{Entire electric field}\rho\phi\, dV$$. Participants clarify that the integral $$\int E^2 dV$$ can be expressed using vector calculus identities, particularly the product rule for scalar multiplication. The identity $$\vec E\cdot\nabla\phi=\nabla\cdot(\vec E\phi)+\phi\nabla\cdot\vec E$$ is identified as a product rule, which aids in the derivation of the potential energy equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potential energy in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically divergence and gradient operators
  • Knowledge of Gauss' theorem and its applications
  • Basic concepts of continuous charge distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of potential energy equations in electrostatics
  • Learn about Gauss' theorem and its implications in electric field calculations
  • Explore vector calculus identities, focusing on the product rule for scalar multiplication
  • Investigate continuous charge distributions and their impact on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of potential energy in electric fields.

Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
The equation below allows us to calculate the potential energy of a continuous distribution of electric charge.
$$U=\frac {\epsilon_0} 2 \iiint\limits_\text{Entire electric field}\vec E^2\,dV$$
In my textbook, the author states
$$U=\frac 1 {8\pi\epsilon_0}\iiint\limits_\text{Entire electric field}\rho\phi\, dV$$
which relates the potential energy of the distribution to its electric potential. I wonder how it is derived from the first equation.

Edit: It looks like the equation is actually a special case of the following formula for a discrete configuration of charges:
$$U=\frac 1{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac 1 2\sum_{j=1}^Nq_j\sum_{k\neq j}\frac{q_k}{r_{jk}}$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
The trick is to write ##\displaystyle{\int} E^2 dV = - \displaystyle{\int} \mathbf{E} \cdot \nabla \phi dV = -\displaystyle{\int}\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E} \phi) dV + \displaystyle{\int} \phi \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} dV##, where the integral is taken over all space. The first term vanishes by Gauss' theorem since ##\mathbf{E}## is zero at infinity.
 
  • Love
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics, Leo Liu and Delta2
ergospherical said:
The trick is to write ##\displaystyle{\int} E^2 dV = - \displaystyle{\int} \mathbf{E} \cdot \nabla \phi dV = -\displaystyle{\int}\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E} \phi) dV + \displaystyle{\int} \phi \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} dV##, where the integral is taken over all space. The first term vanishes by Gauss' theorem since ##\mathbf{E}## is zero at infinity.
Can you tell me what the indentity $$\vec E\cdot\nabla\phi=\nabla\cdot(\vec E\phi)+\phi\nabla\cdot\vec E$$ is called? I am not very familiar with the del operator. Ty!
 
In suffix notation (with the ##x_i## Cartesian coordinates),\begin{align*}
\nabla \cdot (\mathbf{E} \phi) = \sum_i \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \left( E_i \phi \right) &= \sum_i \phi \dfrac{\partial E_i}{\partial x_i} + \sum_i E_i \dfrac{\partial \phi}{\partial x_i} \\

&= \phi \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{E} \cdot \nabla \phi
\end{align*}
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and Leo Liu
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu and Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K