Total electric potential energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total electric potential energy U for a system of point charges q_1, q_2, ..., is defined as U = (1/(4πε₀)) ∑(i PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of electric potential energy in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with the concept of point charges
  • Knowledge of the formula for potential energy between two charges
  • Basic grasp of summation notation and indices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the potential energy formula for multiple point charges
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry in electrostatic potential energy calculations
  • Explore the concept of work done in moving charges in an electric field
  • Investigate the role of ε₀ (permittivity of free space) in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators explaining potential energy concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of electric forces and energy calculations in multi-charge systems.

betelgeuse91
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My textbook states that for point charges ##q_1, q_2, ... ,## where distance between ##q_i## and ##q_j## is ##r_{ij},## the total potential energy U is the sum ## U = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \sum_{i<j} \dfrac{q_iq_j}{r_{ij}} ## and specifically mentions not to count them twice as (i,j) and (j,i), but I don't see why.

Homework Equations


Potential energy of a point charge ##q_i## is ##U_i = \dfrac{q_i}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\sum_{i \neq j}\dfrac{q_j}{r_j} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the above equation, I think the total potential energy should be ## U = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \sum \dfrac{q_iq_j}{r_{ij}} ##, counting both cases (i,j) and (j,i). For instance, when there are two point charges ##q_1## and ##q_2##, the potential energies of individuals is ##U_1 = \dfrac{q_1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\dfrac{q_2}{r_{12}}##, ##U_2 = \dfrac{q_2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\dfrac{q_1}{r_{21}}## so that the total potential energy is the sum ## U = U_1 + U_2 = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \sum_{1\leqslant i,j\leqslant2} \dfrac{q_iq_j}{r_{ij}} ## which counts both the cases (1,2) and (2,1).
Where am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This condition should add to the last equation: ##i\neq j##
 
Suppose you have only 2 charges.
The work done in moving charge 1 into place is zero.
Then you can move charge 2 into place by doing work that depends on R12.
So you don't need R21, since you would be counting the work twice.
Further, if you add an additional charge then the additional work done
depends on R13 and R23 and you don't need to count R31 and R32.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K