Equation of line intersecting two planes

  • Thread starter Thread starter BigFlorida
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Planes
Click For Summary
To find the equation of the line intersecting the planes 2x - y + 2z = 1 and x + y - 2z = 1, the cross product of the normal vectors from the plane equations is essential. The normal vectors can be derived from the coefficients of the variables in the plane equations. The intersection point can be determined by solving the equations simultaneously, allowing for the expression of two variables in terms of the third. The discussion emphasizes the need to represent the line in the form r(t) = (position vector) + t(cross product of normals). Acknowledging the correct form of the plane equations aids in achieving the desired cross product equation.
BigFlorida
Messages
41
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[/B]
Find the cross product equation for the line L that forms the intersection of the planes:

A: 2x - y + 2z = 1 and B: x + y - 2z = 1.

Homework Equations



General equations for planes A and B:

(a, b, and r are vectors).

A: a dot r = 1

B: b dot r = 1

r = xi + yj + zk ; i, j, k here are the unit vectors.

r X (b X a) = b - a

alternatively, (b X a) X r = a - b

The Attempt at a Solution



I only know one way in which to solve for the equation of a line intersecting two planes and that is to use the coefficients of the variables of x, y, and z to define two normal vectors, cross those normal vectors to get a parallel line to the intersecting line, then set x, y, or z equal to zero and solve the equations for x and y to define a point. Then, having a vector in the direction of the line (the cross product of the norms) and a point on the line, put it in the form r(t) = (position vector of point) + t(cross product of the norms). I solved the equation for the line in this way, but my teacher wants it as a "cross product equation." I have no clue how to get a and b to stick into the equations for the planes listed above. The only thing I could think of was using the coefficients of x, y, and z; but that makes no sense because that would be dotting a vector with its normal vector and the product would be 0, not 1. Does anyone have any ideas? The parametric equation I got for the line was r(t) = < 2/3, 1/3, 0, 6, 3 >, but this is not in the r X (b X a) form he wants it in. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is a simpler method: Any point on the intersection of the two planes must lie on both planes. And that means that if we designate the point (x, y, z), x, y, and z must satisfy both equations. Now, if we had three equations, we could, generally, solve for specific values of x, y, and z: three planes intersect in a single point.

With two equations, we can solve for two of the variables in terms of the third, using that third as parameter in parametric equations for a line.

Here, notice that one equation has "-y+ 2z" and the other has "y- 2z". Adding the equations, both y and z cancel, leaving a single equation in x only. Solve that for a specific value for x. The line is parallel to the yz-plane, x is that constant all along the line. Putting that value of x into the equations gives you one equation in y and z. Solve for y in terms of z and use z as parameter or solve for z in terms of y and use y as parameter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes BigFlorida
BigFlorida said:
I have no clue how to get a and b to stick into the equations for the planes listed above. The only thing I could think of was using the coefficients of x, y, and z; but that makes no sense because that would be dotting a vector with its normal vector and the product would be 0, not 1.
Actually, your idea is right. Take the first plane, for example. You have ##2x-y+2z=1##, which can be written as ##(2,-1,2)\cdot(x,y,z) = 1##, which is the form you said you want.

An equation of a plane of the form ##\vec{n}\cdot \vec{r} = 0## corresponds to a plane that passes through the origin. For one that doesn't go through the origin, its equation can be expressed in the form ##\vec{n}\cdot (\vec{r} - \vec{r}_0) = 0##, where ##\vec{r}_0## is a point that lies in the plane.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes BigFlorida
@HallsofIvy I did not think of doing that, but I will definitely give it a shot. Thank you!

@vela I never even considered the case of n⃗ ⋅(r⃗ − r⃗ 0) = 0, thank you so much. That has just helped me accomplish what I set out to do!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K