Equation of the line given a translation vector (that is coincident) and a point

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the equation of a line that passes through the point (1,1) and remains unchanged under the translation vector a = (3,2). The participants derive that the line's equation can be expressed in the form Ax + By + C = 0, leading to the conclusion that the line's equation is x - 2y = -1 or equivalently 2y = x + 1. They clarify that the translation vector (3,2) serves as the direction vector of the line, confirming that the line maps onto itself under this translation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear equations in the form Ax + By + C = 0
  • Knowledge of vector translation and its geometric implications
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates and slope-intercept form
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector translation and its effects on linear equations
  • Explore the concept of direction vectors in geometry
  • Learn how to derive equations of lines from given points and slopes
  • Investigate the relationship between parallel lines and translation vectors
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding linear equations and vector translations in geometry.

singleton
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Hey,

Usually I have a general idea how to tackle a problem when posting on here.

This time I am pretty darn lost :(

When asked to find the equation of the line that passes through a point (1,1) and maps onto itself under the translation vector a = (3,2).

I start with Ax + By + C = 0

The equation of the image is
A(x - 3) + B(y - 2) + C = 0
Ax - 3A + By - 2B + C = 0

The point (1, 1) satisfies the equation since the translation "maps onto itself" (I'm taking this as it means a parallel and coincident line? not heard that terminology before..."maps onto itself") So the point is on both lines...

Basically I know that (1, 1) satisfies the equation of the image, and that when I substitute I end up with
Ax - 3A + By - 2B + C = 0
A(1) - 3A + B(1) - 2B + C = 0
-2A -B + C = 0

I almost wanted to say the normal vector for the translation was (-2, -1) but that is incorrect, as those numbers (-2 and -1) are the coefficients I have for A and B AFTER I substitute not BEFORE...

Just a small hint or suggestion how to tackle this Q would be great :)

I know (rather, I think) that I should be exploring the equation of the image (the translation) but I do not know what more I can do to find the normal vector (so I can write the Cartesian equation of the unknown line)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you translate the line by (3,2) then you get the same line back. For example, if you have the x-axis, and you translate it by (3,2), you get a different line, but if you translate it by (3,0) you get the same line. Translating a line will give you back the same line if and only if you translate in the direction that it's already "facing." So you can tell from this the direction vector of the line, and you already know one point that lies on the line, so you have all the necessary information to describe it (and give its Cartesian equation if you want).
 
Oh forgive me please.

It is my understanding that if the line "maps onto itself under a translation along vector a = (3,2)" we know that what this says is that the new line is the same line as before, correct?

Then, if we find the image of point (1,1) under the translation vector (3,2), which is point (4,3) we know that this point is on the line. We also know that the original point, (1, 1) is on the line since it is still the same line as before...

So the translation vector is also the same as the direction vector, (3,2) ?
And the vector equation is: r = (1,1) + t(3,2) ? (then find a normal vector and go from there)
 
Last edited:
Yes to all questions.
 
thanks very much :)
 
Essentially, saying that the vector <3,2> translates the line into itself just means that the vector <3,2> points "in the same direction" as the line. Even more helpful: if (x,y) is a point on the line then so is (x+3, y+2).

Here you are told that the point (1,1) is on the line and the vector <3,2> translates the line into itself. (1,1) translated by <3,2> is (1+3,1+2)= (4, 3) so we know that the two points (1,1) and (3,2) are on the line.

Write the line y= mx+ b. (1,1) is on the line means 1= m(1)+ b or m+ b= 1. (3,2) is on the line meas 2= m(3)+ b or 3m+ b= 2. Subtracting m+ b= 1 from that gives
2m= 1 or m= 1/2. m+ b= 1 becomes 1/2+ b= 1 so b= 1- 1/2= 1/2.

The equation of the line is y= (1/2)x+ 1/2 or 2y= x+ 1.

You could, of course, use the form Ax+ By= C. Putting x= 1, y= 1 gives A+ B= C.
Putting x= 3, y= 2 gives 3A+ 2B= C. That's two equations for 3 unknowns but that is because multiplying Ax+ By= C by any number gives another equation for the same line. We can choose one of the numbers to be anything (except 0) that we like and still have an equation for the same line.

Subtracting A+ B= C from 3A+ 2B= C eliminates C leaving 2A+ B= 0 or B= -2A. Choosing A= 1 gives B= -2 and C= A+ B= 1- 2= -1.

The equation is x- 2y= -1 which is the same as 2y= x+ 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K