What are the 8 distinct critical points for the given equations?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter squenshl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the distinct critical points for the function f(x,y,z) = x³ + y³ + z³, subject to the constraint g(x,y,z) = x² + y² - z² - 1 = 0. Participants explore various methods for applying the method of Lagrange multipliers and the implications of the constraint on the critical points.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the Lagrangian method and derives the equations Lx = 3x² - 2λx = 0, Ly = 3y² - 2λy = 0, Lz = 3z² - 2λz = 0.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to reintroduce the constraint into the system of equations to solve for λ and the critical points.
  • Several participants derive that x = y = z leads to critical points at (±1, ±1, ±1), suggesting a total of 8 critical points.
  • One participant points out a potential mistake in applying the constraint, arguing that it should yield 3x² = 1 instead of x² = 1, leading to critical points at x = ±1/√3.
  • Another participant warns against dividing by potential zeroes and suggests considering cases where one or more variables are zero, which could lead to additional critical points.
  • There is a correction regarding the constraint, with participants confirming it as x² + y² - z² - 1 = 0 and discussing the implications for the critical points derived.
  • One participant lists cases based on the values of x, y, and z being zero or non-zero, leading to distinct critical points in various scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct application of the constraint and the resulting critical points. While some agree on the total of 8 critical points, others challenge the derivations and suggest alternative approaches. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the critical points and the implications of the constraint.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the values of x, y, and z, particularly concerning divisions by zero and the implications of the constraint on the derived equations. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the constraint and its impact on the critical points.

squenshl
Messages
468
Reaction score
4
Optimize f(x,y,z) = x3 + y3 + z3, subject to the constraint g(x,y,z) = x2 + y2 + z2 - 1 = 0

Step 1:
I did L = f - \lambdag = x3 + y3 + z3 - \lambda(x2 + y2 + z2 - 1)

Step 2:
I got Lx = 3x2 - 2\lambdax = 0, Ly = 3y2 - 2\lambday = 0, Lz = 3z2 - 2\lambdaz = 0

Now I can't seem to solve these 3 equations to get the critical points & find what \lambda is. Some help please. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Remember that you also need to use the equation x^2+y^2+z^2=1 to solve for lambda...

even though you used this equation in your lagrangian, the "=1" part kind of gets washed away when applying the E-L equations, and you need to introduce it back into the system of equations in order to find a solution.
 


Alright. 3x2 = 2\lambdax, 3y2 = 2\lambday, 3z2 = 2\lambdaz
\Rightarrow 3/2x = 3/2y = 3/2z \Rightarrow x = y = z
Putting this into the constraint \Rightarrow x2 = 1 so x = \pm1, y = \pm1, z = \pm1, I got 8 critical points (1,1,1), (1,-1,1),(1,1,-1),(1,-1,-1),(-1,1,1),(-1,-1,1,),(-1,1,1) & (-1,-1,-1). Putting x = y = z = \pm1 to find \lambda I get \lambda = 3/2 for x, y & z. Is this right? I'm pretty sure it is. Then I just use the reduced hessian to find the nature of the critical points (Max, min or saddle).
 


squenshl said:
Alright. 3x2 = 2\lambdax, 3y2 = 2\lambday, 3z2 = 2\lambdaz
\Rightarrow 3/2x = 3/2y = 3/2z \Rightarrow x = y = z
Putting this into the constraint \Rightarrow x2 = 1 so x = \pm1, y = \pm1, z = \pm1, I got 8 critical points (1,1,1), (1,-1,1),(1,1,-1),(1,-1,-1),(-1,1,1),(-1,-1,1,),(-1,1,1) & (-1,-1,-1). Putting x = y = z = \pm1 to find \lambda I get \lambda = 3/2 for x, y & z. Is this right? I'm pretty sure it is. Then I just use the reduced hessian to find the nature of the critical points (Max, min or saddle).


I think you made a mistake when putting the equations back into the constraint...

with x=y=z, you should get 3x^2=1 (not x^2=1) which will give you factors of 1/Sqrt(3) in your answer.

with the equations you have written out i think lambda ends up being Sqrt(3)/2
 


DO NOT DIVIDE WITH POTENTIAL ZEROES!.

You have the 4 equations:
x(3x-2\lambda)=0
y(3y-2\lambda)=0
z(3z-2\lambda)=0
x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}-1=0

Consider the case x=0:

This gives you an additional 3 cases:
a) y=0, z something else
b) z=0, y something else
c) Neither z or y 0.

Thus, since this can be copied for the two other variables as well, you'll have a lot more critical points to consider:smile:

EDIT:

Furthermore, since those points you found REQUIRED x=y=z, then evidently a point like (-1,1,1) couldn't possibly work, right?


FURTHERMORE:

Don't bother about the Hessian; too much trouble!
You ought to be able to see which of the solutions represent optimizations of f
 
Last edited:


Sorry. The constraint was x2 + y2 - z2 - 1 = 0. My bad. So I think my answers are right.
 


Nope, you are right. It is x = y = z = 1/sqrt(3). Am I right to say there are 8 critical points.
 
Last edited:


well if the constraint is the one you gave us the second time, then indeed you should not get x=y=z=1/Sqrt(3). Check your L_z equation again...

regardless, arildno is correct in that you must cover your bases and watch your divisions by 0 here.
 


It is x = y = -z
So x = y = -z = \pm1/\sqrt{3}
 
  • #10


NO, here you have x=y=-z and x^2+y^2-z^2=1 which leads to 2x^2-x^2=1 and thus x=1,x=-1. HOWEVER, notice that this is in the case that x,y,z<>0.
 
  • #11


squenshl said:
Sorry. The constraint was x2 + y2 - z2 - 1 = 0. My bad. So I think my answers are right.
Is your constraint:
a) x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}-1=0
OR
b) x^{2}+y^{2}-z^{2}-1=0

Furthermore, it does not seem that you understand that you cannot divide by zero.
 
  • #12


x2 + y2 - z2 - 1 = 0
 
  • #13


squenshl said:
x2 + y2 - z2 - 1 = 0

In that case, you have the 4 equations:
x(3x-2\lambda)=0
y(3y-2\lambda)=0
z(3z+2\lambda)=0
x^{2}+y^{2}-z^{2}-1=0

A) Suppose that neither x, y or z are 0.

Then, we get x=y=-z.

Inserting this into the last equation yields:
x^{2}-1=0\to{x}=\pm{1}
Thus, we get TWO critical points, namely (1,1,-1) and (-1,-1,1)

B) Suppose that x=z=0
Then, we get from the last equation:
y^{2}-1=0\to{y}=\pm{1}
Thus, we get TWO critical points, namely (0,1,0) and (0,-1,0)

C) Suppose y=z=0.
Then, in analogy with B, we get the critical points (1,0,0), (-1,0,0)

D) Impossible cases:
Assume that x=y=0. Then the last equation reads -z^2-1=0, which has no solutions.

Furthermore, assume x=0, neither y or z 0. Then y=-z, and the last equation reduces to -1=0, which is false.

Similarly for y=0, neither x or z 0.

E) z=0, neither x or y 0.
Then, x=y, and the last equation becoms:
2x^{2}-1=0\to{x}=\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}

This yields the last two critical points:
(\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},0)



Thus, in total, we get 8 distinct critical points, to be found in A), B), C) and E).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K