Equations of motion from Born-Infeld Lagrangian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equations of motion from the Born-Infeld Lagrangian, specifically the form \(\partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu}=0\) in empty space. The Euler-Lagrange equation is introduced as \(\partial_{\nu}\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_{\mu,\nu}}=0\), where \(A_{\mu,\nu}=\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}\). Participants emphasize the importance of understanding ordinary electrodynamics, referencing Jackson's textbook for foundational knowledge and Zwiebach's "A First Course in String Theory" for further insights into the Born-Infeld theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Born-Infeld Lagrangian
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Knowledge of ordinary electrodynamics
  • Proficiency in tensor calculus and notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of covariant Maxwell equations from the ordinary action \(F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\)
  • Explore the implications of the Born-Infeld Lagrangian in theoretical physics
  • Review Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" for foundational electrodynamics concepts
  • Read Zwiebach's "A First Course in String Theory" for insights into string theory applications
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and anyone interested in advanced electrodynamics and string theory applications.

OhNoYaDidn't
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
We can write the Born-Infeld Lagrangian as:

L_{BI}=1 - \sqrt{ 1+\frac{1}{2}F_{\mu\nu }F^{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{16}\left(F_{\mu\nu}\widetilde{F}^{\mu\nu} \right)^{2}}

with G^{\mu\nu}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial F_{\mu\nu}} how can we show that in empty space the equations of motion take the form \partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu}=0
We should start with an Euler-Lagrange equation, but how can i write it for this Lagrangian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The EL equation for this case is
$$\partial_{\nu}\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_{\mu,\nu}}=0$$
where ##A_{\mu,\nu}=\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}##. Using ##F_{\mu\nu}=A_{\nu,\mu}-A_{\mu,\nu}##, the rest should be straightforward. See also Jackson to see how covariant Maxwell equations are derived for ordinary ##F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}## action. For other details about Born Infeld see Zwiebach - A First Course in String Theory.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vahdaneh and OhNoYaDidn't
Thank you, Demystifier.
I have never seen F_{\mu\nu} written like that, but using that:
F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}=(A_{\nu\mu}-A_{\mu\nu})(A^{\nu\mu}-A^{\mu\nu})=A_{\nu\mu}A^{\nu\mu}-A_{\nu\mu}A^{\mu\nu}-A_{\mu\nu}A^{\nu\mu}+A_{\mu\nu}A^{\mu\nu}
(F_{\mu\nu}\widetilde{F}^{\mu\nu})^{2}=((A_{\nu\mu}-A_{\mu\nu})\widetilde{F}^{\mu\nu})^{2}

\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_{\mu\nu}} = \frac{-\frac{1}{4}({-A^{\nu\mu}+A^{\mu\nu}})+\frac{1}{16}A_{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}(\widetilde{F}^{\mu\nu})^{2}}{\sqrt{ 1+\frac{1}{2}F_{\mu\nu }F^{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{16}\left(F_{\mu\nu}\widetilde{F}^{\mu\nu} \right)^{2}}}
What do i do with the \partial_{\nu} now?
 
OhNoYaDidn't said:
I have never seen F_{\mu\nu} written like that
Than you should first learn ordinary electrodynamics. See the Jackson's textbook.
 
OhNoYaDidn't said:
using that

You left out the commas. Look closely at what Demystifier posted; there are commas, so it's ##F_{\mu \nu} = A_{\nu , \mu} - A_{\mu , \nu}##. The commas are partial derivatives, so what he wrote is the same as ##F_{\mu \nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu##.

As Demystifier said, you need a good background in ordinary electrodynamics for the topic under discussion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OhNoYaDidn't

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K