Equilibrium problem and a beam of mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a uniform beam of mass 76 kg and length 3 m, supported by two pivots, and examines the placement of an additional mass of 150 kg without causing the beam to tip. The discussion centers around equilibrium conditions and the forces acting on the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the net forces in the vertical direction and the sum of torques around the pivots. There are questions about the signs of forces causing rotation and the identification of unknown forces in the equations. Some suggest using a system of equations to solve for the unknowns, while others question the necessity of certain forces in the torque calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on setting up equations and clarifying terms. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity due to multiple unknowns, and some participants are exploring different approaches to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the assumptions made about the forces and torques, particularly in relation to the pivot points and the placement of the additional mass. The original poster expresses confusion about the assumptions needed to proceed with the solution.

Oomair
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Equilibrium problem

Homework Statement



A uniform beam of mass 76 kg and length 3 m rests on two pivots, one at the left edge and one 2.4 m from the left edge. How far to the right of the right pivot can a mass of 150 kg be placed without the beam tipping?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



net forces in y direction, Fy : F1(pivot on egde) - Fg(weight of board) +F1(2nd pivot) - mg

Sum of torque(im torquing around the rigt piovt): F1(2.4m) - Fg(.9m) -mg(x)

the problem I am having is that i have two unknown forces from the pivots, and when i solve for one of the forces, the results cancel out and x = 0, i don't what i am supposed to assume?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F1 and mg would both cause clockwise rotation, so they should have the same sign.
 
which F1 are you talking about? and which mg?
 
Try three equations - three unknowns system (x, normal force one, normal force two)

You can pick first torque center at N1/N2, second at 150g mass .. and this give 2 eqns ..

and third is simply adding all forces ...

F1(pivot on egde) - Fg(weight of board) +F1(2nd pivot) "+" mg .. i think as said by chi meson
 
Oomair said:
which F1 are you talking about? and which mg?

He meant the ones in your torque equation.
 
What is F1 (on the left edge pivot) when the 150 kg is placed right at the tipping point?
 
Redbelly98 said:
What is F1 (on the left edge pivot) when the 150 kg is placed right at the tipping point?

One step further, is F1 needed at all?
 
i got it, thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K