Equipotential Surfaces and Electric Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field magnitude and direction from given equipotential surfaces. The electric field magnitude was determined to be 559 V/m using the equation E = -V/R, where R is calculated as 4sin(26.565). The user initially struggled with determining the correct angle for the electric field direction but ultimately resolved the issue. The change in potential for a distance of 1.50 V was also addressed, indicating a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and equipotential surfaces
  • Familiarity with the equation E = -V/R
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine
  • Ability to interpret graphical representations of electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the relationship between electric field strength and potential difference
  • Learn about the concept of equipotential lines in electrostatics
  • Study the implications of electric field direction in circuit analysis
  • Investigate the applications of electric fields in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields and equipotential surfaces.

ihearyourecho
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A given system has the equipotential surfaces shown in the figure .
http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1122530/1/Walker.20.39.jpg

A)What is the magnitude of the electric field?
B)What is the direction of the electric field? (in degrees from the +x axis)
C)What is the shortest distance one can move to undergo a change in potential of 1.50 V?


Homework Equations


E=-V/R


The Attempt at a Solution


I found the answer to the Part A:
E= -V/R, R=4sin(26.565)
E=559 V/M

I cannot wrap my head around the answer to Part B, though. I thought it would simply be 180-25.65, but that's wrong. Any help?

I also know how to do Part C, so just Part B would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Answers that are also not correct are:
153
63.4
117.
 
Nevermind, I was doing the angle perpendicular in the wrong direction. I got the answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K