Equiprobability of Particles in an Isolated Box

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kashmir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equiprobability of classical distinguishable particles in an isolated box, particularly focusing on the probability of configurations of particles in two hypothetical halves of the box. Participants explore the implications of initial conditions on the probabilities and the assumptions of equiprobability in statistical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the assumption that the probability of having ##n## particles in one side of the box is given by ##P_n=C(n)/2^N##, arguing that it relies on the notion of equiprobability, which they find questionable.
  • There is a discussion about the meaning of equilibrium in this context, with some suggesting that if equilibrium refers to a long-term state, it does not address the original question.
  • Participants express confusion regarding the concept of classical particles having finitely many states, clarifying that the configuration refers to the number of particles in each side rather than energy states.
  • One participant proposes that if any state is reachable from any other state through transitions, then indistinguishability could lead to symmetry among transitions, suggesting a Markov process.
  • Concerns are raised about the likelihood of certain configurations, such as a particle having a purely vertical trajectory, which would prevent state transitions.
  • Another participant argues that if the particles are independent and the sides are identical, then each particle should have an equal chance of being on either side, leading to equiprobability of microstates over time.
  • There is a challenge regarding the influence of initial conditions on the probabilities, questioning why they do not affect the equiprobability assumption.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the assumptions of equiprobability and the influence of initial conditions, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the assumptions about the independence of particles and the implications of initial conditions on the evolution of the system's states.

Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Suppose we've an isolated box having ##N## classical distinguishable particles in it, the box being hypothetically divided into two parts, left and right with both parts identical.

Its said that the probability of having the configuration of ##n## particles in the left side is given as ##P_n=C(n)/2^N## with ##C(n)## being the total number of ways in which ##n## particles from ##N## can be placed in the left side.

Why should ##P_n=C(n)/2^N## be the probability? It should be true only if each configuration is equiprobable, but I don't think it is equiprobable. Our initial conditions (position and velocity of particles) will determine the evolution of the states of the system, so it might be that some states occur more frequently than other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kashmir said:
with both parts identical
Do you mean: in equilibrium ?
 
I have trouble with the idea that we have classical particles and that we also have finitely many states.
 
jbriggs444 said:
I have trouble with the idea that we have classical particles and that we also have finitely many states.
These are not energy states. The configuration here is just the number of particles in each side.
 
BvU said:
Do you mean: in equilibrium ?
What does equilibrium mean here? If that means the state after a long time, then then the question isn't answered.
 
Kashmir said:
These are not energy states. The configuration here is just the number of particles in each side.
Ahhh, perfect. Then all we need is that any state is reachable from any other state after some series of transitions. Then indistinguishability leads to a symmetry among the transitions and we have a Markov process.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Ahhh, perfect. Then all we need is that any state is reachable from any other state after some series of transitions.
Thanks for you comment.

How do we know that any state is reachable? Suppose i start the experiment with ##N## particle with ##n## on one side each with some velocity.

Also the partition into left and right side is hypothetical, the box is sealed and has no partition, we just mentally divide it into two, as I've mentioned in the original question.
 
Kashmir said:
How do we know that any state is reachable?
In general, you cannot. It is a handwave. Albeit a pretty reasonable one.

Maybe you had one classical particle on the left side with a purely vertical trajectory. No state transitions will ever take place. But how likely is that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kashmir
jbriggs444 said:
In general, you cannot. It is a handwave. Albeit a pretty reasonable one.

Maybe you had one classical particle on the left side with a purely vertical trajectory. No state transitions will ever take place. But how likely is that?
Yes very unlikely.
Could you help me with this:

"Why should ##P_n=C(n)/2N## be the probability? It should be true only if each configuration is equiprobable, but I don't think it is equiprobable. Our initial conditions (position and velocity of particles) will determine the evolution of the states of the system, so it might be that some states occur more frequently than other"?
 
  • #10
Kashmir said:
"Why should ##P_n=C(n)/2N## be the probability? It should be true only if each configuration is equiprobable, but I don't think it is equiprobable. Our initial conditions (position and velocity of particles) will determine the evolution of the states of the system, so it might be that some states occur more frequently than other"?
If they are classical particles, they are zero size, non-interacting and, accordingly, independent. Since the two sides identical then, each particle eventually has 50/50 chance of being on either side. Since the particles are independent, all ##2^N## microstates are [eventually] equiprobable.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
jbriggs444 said:
If they are classical particles, they are zero size, non-interacting and, accordingly, independent. Since the two sides identical then, each particle eventually has 50/50 chance of being on either side. Since the particles are independent, all ##2^N## microstates are [eventually] equiprobable.
Why don't the initial conditions influence the probabilities ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K