I Equiprobability of Particles in an Isolated Box

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kashmir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the probability of finding a certain number of particles in one half of an isolated box, expressed as P_n = C(n)/2^N, where C(n) is the number of ways to arrange n particles. There is debate about whether this probability holds true since the initial conditions of particles, such as position and velocity, could affect state evolution and lead to non-equiprobable configurations. The concept of equilibrium is questioned, with some participants suggesting that any state must be reachable from another through transitions, implying a Markov process. However, concerns are raised about the likelihood of certain configurations persisting, particularly if particles have specific trajectories. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the tension between classical mechanics assumptions and the implications of initial conditions on particle distribution probabilities.
Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Suppose we've an isolated box having ##N## classical distinguishable particles in it, the box being hypothetically divided into two parts, left and right with both parts identical.

Its said that the probability of having the configuration of ##n## particles in the left side is given as ##P_n=C(n)/2^N## with ##C(n)## being the total number of ways in which ##n## particles from ##N## can be placed in the left side.

Why should ##P_n=C(n)/2^N## be the probability? It should be true only if each configuration is equiprobable, but I don't think it is equiprobable. Our initial conditions (position and velocity of particles) will determine the evolution of the states of the system, so it might be that some states occur more frequently than other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kashmir said:
with both parts identical
Do you mean: in equilibrium ?
 
I have trouble with the idea that we have classical particles and that we also have finitely many states.
 
jbriggs444 said:
I have trouble with the idea that we have classical particles and that we also have finitely many states.
These are not energy states. The configuration here is just the number of particles in each side.
 
BvU said:
Do you mean: in equilibrium ?
What does equilibrium mean here? If that means the state after a long time, then then the question isn't answered.
 
Kashmir said:
These are not energy states. The configuration here is just the number of particles in each side.
Ahhh, perfect. Then all we need is that any state is reachable from any other state after some series of transitions. Then indistinguishability leads to a symmetry among the transitions and we have a Markov process.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Ahhh, perfect. Then all we need is that any state is reachable from any other state after some series of transitions.
Thanks for you comment.

How do we know that any state is reachable? Suppose i start the experiment with ##N## particle with ##n## on one side each with some velocity.

Also the partition into left and right side is hypothetical, the box is sealed and has no partition, we just mentally divide it into two, as I've mentioned in the original question.
 
Kashmir said:
How do we know that any state is reachable?
In general, you cannot. It is a handwave. Albeit a pretty reasonable one.

Maybe you had one classical particle on the left side with a purely vertical trajectory. No state transitions will ever take place. But how likely is that?
 
  • Like
Likes Kashmir
jbriggs444 said:
In general, you cannot. It is a handwave. Albeit a pretty reasonable one.

Maybe you had one classical particle on the left side with a purely vertical trajectory. No state transitions will ever take place. But how likely is that?
Yes very unlikely.
Could you help me with this:

"Why should ##P_n=C(n)/2N## be the probability? It should be true only if each configuration is equiprobable, but I don't think it is equiprobable. Our initial conditions (position and velocity of particles) will determine the evolution of the states of the system, so it might be that some states occur more frequently than other"?
 
  • #10
Kashmir said:
"Why should ##P_n=C(n)/2N## be the probability? It should be true only if each configuration is equiprobable, but I don't think it is equiprobable. Our initial conditions (position and velocity of particles) will determine the evolution of the states of the system, so it might be that some states occur more frequently than other"?
If they are classical particles, they are zero size, non-interacting and, accordingly, independent. Since the two sides identical then, each particle eventually has 50/50 chance of being on either side. Since the particles are independent, all ##2^N## microstates are [eventually] equiprobable.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
jbriggs444 said:
If they are classical particles, they are zero size, non-interacting and, accordingly, independent. Since the two sides identical then, each particle eventually has 50/50 chance of being on either side. Since the particles are independent, all ##2^N## microstates are [eventually] equiprobable.
Why don't the initial conditions influence the probabilities ?
 
Back
Top