Erik Verlinde's paper on Emergent Entropy

In summary, Bekenstein's original thought experiment, which led to his famous entropy formula, involved a particle attached to a "string" being dropped into a black hole just before its horizon. This resulted in an infinite redshift, allowing the black hole's mass to be made arbitrarily small. However, this posed a problem for the second law of thermodynamics. Bekenstein solved this by considering a particle one Compton wavelength away from the horizon to be part of the black hole, increasing its mass and horizon area by a small amount, which he equated to one bit of information. This explanation is detailed in Bekenstein's original paper.
  • #1
M. next
382
0
There is one paragraph that says:
"
Our starting assumption is directly motivated by Bekenstein's original thought experiment
from which he obtained is famous entropy formula. He considered a particle with
mass m attached to a ctitious "string" that is lowered towards a black hole. Just
before the horizon the particle is dropped in. Due to the in nite redshift the mass
increase of the black hole can be made arbitrarily small, classically. If one would take a
thermal gas of particles, this fact would lead to problems with the second law of thermodynamics.
Bekenstein solved this by arguing that when a particle is one Compton
wavelength from the horizon, it is considered to be part of the black hole. Therefore,
it increases the mass and horizon area by a small amount, which he identi ed with one
bit of information. This lead him to his area law for the black hole entropy."

I don't quite understand what he meant when he gave the thermal gas example. How does it lead to problems with the second law of thermodynamics?

Also how exactly does a particle being a Compton of wavelength away from the horizon (so as becoming part of the black hole) solve the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
you have to read Bekenstein's original paper listed in the references.
 
  • #3
I was hoping I get some help just concerning this very idea without getting to read the whole paper from whom are familiar with this.
 

1. What is Erik Verlinde's paper on Emergent Entropy about?

Erik Verlinde's paper, titled "On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton," proposes a new theory of gravity that suggests it is not a fundamental force, but rather an emergent phenomenon that arises from the laws of thermodynamics and information theory.

2. How does Verlinde's theory differ from traditional theories of gravity?

Verlinde's theory differs from traditional theories of gravity, such as Einstein's theory of general relativity, in that it does not rely on the existence of a gravitational force or the curvature of spacetime. Instead, it suggests that gravity is a result of the way information is organized in the universe.

3. What is "emergent entropy" and how does it relate to Verlinde's theory?

Emergent entropy, also known as entropic gravity, is a concept in Verlinde's theory that describes how gravity arises from the collective behavior of matter and energy in the universe. It suggests that the entropy, or disorder, of a system is directly related to the amount of gravity it produces.

4. Has Verlinde's theory been tested or proven?

At this time, Verlinde's theory has not been definitively proven or disproven. It is still a relatively new and controversial idea in the scientific community, and further research and experimentation will be needed to fully test its validity.

5. What are some potential implications of Verlinde's theory if it is proven to be true?

If Verlinde's theory is proven to be true, it could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe and the laws of physics. It could also potentially lead to new technologies and advancements in areas such as space travel and quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
371
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
266
Replies
6
Views
754
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top