Error Calculation for Triangular Plate Sides

  • Thread starter Thread starter steve2510
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Error
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the length of the remaining side of a triangular plate given two sides and an included angle, along with determining the maximum possible error in this result. The subject area is primarily focused on geometry and error analysis in measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of measurement precision, particularly the meaning of "to the nearest millimetre." There are attempts to apply the cosine rule for finding the length of the remaining side, and participants explore the use of partial derivatives to calculate the error.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants providing guidance on the calculations, particularly regarding the conversion of angles to radians and the correct application of partial derivatives. There is a recognition of various interpretations and approaches to the problem, with some participants noting potential errors in previous calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing examination of the assumptions related to the measurements and the implications of rounding in the context of error analysis. Participants are also addressing the need for clarity in the mathematical expressions used in their calculations.

steve2510
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two Sides of a triangular plate are measured as 125mm and 160mm, each to the nearest millimetre. The included angle is quoted as 60+-1. Calculate the length of the remaining side and the maximum possible error in this result

My first question is to the nearest millimetre? What does this mean, i think +-0.5 but when i think about this if it was 0.5 biggest it would be rounded up..

Homework Equations


δu = Fxδx + Fyδy + Fzδz

The Attempt at a Solution


So firstly to find the length of the other side i used the cosine rule
a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2bccos(A)
Where b = 125
c = 160
A = pi/3
Which comes out as 145.7 which is correct.
The next stage i guess is to take partial derivatives.
My equation for a is a^2 so i assume i have to square root it so i can find δa I am not sure but i guess i have to??
δa = partial with respect to b * δb + partial with respect to c *δc + partial with respect to A δA

Therefore a = (b^2 + c^2 - 2bcCos(A))^1/2
Okay this is where it gets messy.
Partial with respect to b:
[1/2 * 2b-2cCosA/(b^2+c^2-2bcCos(A))^1/2] *δb

Partial with respect to C
[1/2 * 2c - 2bcos(A)/((b^2+c^2-2bcCos(A))^1/2) ]*δc

Partial with respect to A
[2bcsinA/((b^2+c^2-2bcCos(A))^1/2)] *δA

When i input values of δb and δc = +-0.5 and δA = +-1 i don't seem to get the right answer which is +- 2.6, i really don't see where I'm going wrong, as i did the similar method with a previous exercise.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My first question is to the nearest millimetre? What does this mean, i think +-0.5
Right.
but when i think about this if it was 0.5 biggest it would be rounded up..
True, but 0.4999999 (add as many finite[/size] 9 as you like) would be rounded down, the smallest upper bound is 0.5.

My equation for a is a^2 so i assume i have to square root it so i can find δa I am not sure but i guess i have to??
You can calculate δa^2 as intermediate result if you like.

I think there are some brackets missing in your derivatives.
Which answer do you get?
 
Last edited:
My answers are
Partial b = [((2b-2cCosA)/2*(b^2+c^2-2bcCos(A))^1/2] *δb
= [((250 - 160)/2*((125^2 + 160^2 - 2*160*125*0.5)^0.5))] * 0.5
= (90/291.4) * 0.5 = +-0.154
partial c has the same denominator
[((2c - 2bcos(A)) / 291.4) ]*0.5
= 195/291.4 * 0.5 = +-0.335
Partial A has the same denominator aswell
= (125*250*2*sin(pi/3)) / 291.4
Which is a really large number, not sure what's going wrong there..

The correct answer is 2.6, i don't seem to be close to that at present, i guess there must be a simple mistake I'm making.
 
Did you convert ##\delta A## to radians as well?
 
Nope completely forgot about that, thanks
Well that leaves me with
[(125*250*2*sin(pi/3) / 291.4 ] *pi/180 = 3.24 which is still off, i can't see where I've made a mistake, I've done problems after this one and been fine, i just can't seem to get this one.
 
The 250 in the numerator should be 160, no?

Also, I get a slightly different expression for the partial derivative wrt A than you do.
 
δa = \frac{\partial a}{\partial b} δb + \frac{\partial a}{\partial c} δc + \frac{\partial a}{\partial A} *δA

δb = 0.5 δc = 0.5 δA = pi/180

\frac{\partial a}{\partial b} = \frac{b-cCos(A)}{\sqrt{b^{2}+c^{2} - 2bccos(A)}}
\frac{\partial a}{\partial b} = \frac{125-160*Cos(\frac{pi}{3})}{\sqrt{125^{2}+160^{2} - 2bccos(\frac{pi}{3})}} = \frac{45}{145.688}
\frac{\partial a}{\partial b} = 0.309
\frac{\partial a}{\partial b} * δb = 0.1545

\frac{\partial a}{\partial c} = \frac{c-bCos(A)}{\sqrt{b^{2}+c^{2} - 2bccos(A)}}
\frac{\partial a}{\partial c} = \frac{160-125*Cos(\frac{pi}{3})}{\sqrt{125^{2}+160^{2} - 2bccos(\frac{pi}{3})}} = \frac{97.5}{145.688}
\frac{\partial a}{\partial c} = 0.669
\frac{\partial a}{\partial c} * δc = 0.335

\frac{\partial a}{\partial A} = \frac{cbsin(A)}{\sqrt{b^{2}+c^{2} - 2bccos(A)}}
\frac{\partial a}{\partial A} = \frac{160*125*sin(\frac{pi}{3})}{\sqrt{125^{2}+160^{2} - 2bccos(\frac{pi}{3})}} = \frac{365.52}{145.688}
\frac{\partial a}{\partial A} = 2.509
\frac{\partial a}{\partial A} * δA = 0.044

I know for a fact these won't add up to 2.6, so i very confused at which stage I am going wrong.
 
160*125*sin(pi/3) is not 365.52. Make sure that you use radians for the sine, not degrees.
 
oo what a silly mistake
\frac{\partial a}{\partial A} = \frac{160*125*sin(\frac{pi}{3})}{\sqrt{125^{2}+160^{2} - 2bccos(\frac{pi}{3})}} = \frac{17320.51}{145.688}
\frac{\partial a}{\partial A} = 118.888
\frac{\partial a}{\partial A} * δA = 2.075

2.075 + 0.1545 + 0.335 = δa
δa = 2.56 → 2.6 which is the correct answer yey, thanks very much.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K