Error propagation - partial derivative?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on error propagation methods for calculating the error in the expression Z = B * Cos(θ), specifically in the context of a Williamson Hall plot. The participants compare two approaches: one using partial derivatives and the other using standard error propagation formulas. Both methods yield the same results when applied correctly, but discrepancies arise when errors in θ are not properly converted to radians or when calculations are incorrectly executed. Ultimately, the consensus is that both methods are valid, provided the calculations are accurate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of error propagation techniques
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically Cosine
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives in calculus
  • Ability to convert angles between degrees and radians
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about error propagation in experimental physics
  • Study the application of partial derivatives in error analysis
  • Explore the Williamson Hall plot and its significance in materials science
  • Practice converting between degrees and radians in calculations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers involved in experimental data analysis, particularly those working with error propagation in measurements related to crystallography and material characterization.

izzy93
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I am getting a little confused on which error propagation to use:

I am looking to calculate the error in B*Cos(θ) , for the vertical axis of a williamson hall plot. where B is fwhm of a peak with it's own error and cos of the bragg angle

I am unsure of whether i need to use partial derivative error propagation

let Z= B*cos(θ)

then ΔZ =[ ((dZ/dB)^2 *(ΔB)^2 ) +((dZ/dcosθ)^2 (Δcosθ)^2) ]^0.5

or standard way

Δz = [ (ΔB/B)^2 +(Δcosθ/cosθ)^2 ]0.5 * Z

Any clarification on this would be much appreciated,
thanks
http://file://localhost/Users/isabellasharpley/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip/0/clip_image001.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you measure the error in θ or the error in cos θ?

If you have the error in cos θ, then either of your two formulas should work. They should give the same result. In fact, you can derive the second formula from the first one.

If you have the error in θ instead, then you need a formula similar to your first formula, but using dZ/dθ and Δθ instead of dZ/d(cos θ) and Δ(cos θ).
 
Hi jtbell,

thanks for your response.

I have an error in θ and also worked out the error in cosθ as Δcosθ = sinθ Δθ.

the thing is partial derivative formulas (which give the same result) gives me a much larger error compared to the other one, so I'm inclined to go with that one...
 
If the error was measured in, or converted to Cosθ you should not need to differentiate to – Sinθ as the value of Cosθ is just treated as a constant.
 
<br /> Z\quad =\quad B\quad \times \quad Cos\theta \\ \frac { \delta Z }{ \delta B } \quad =\quad Cos\theta \\ \frac { \delta Z }{ \delta (Cos\theta ) } \quad =\quad B\\ \\ \Delta Z\quad =\quad (B\quad \times \quad \Delta Cos\theta )\quad +\quad (Cos\theta \quad \times \quad \Delta B)\\<br /> <br />
 
izzy93 said:
I have an error in θ and also worked out the error in cosθ as Δcosθ = sinθ Δθ.

OK.

the thing is partial derivative formulas (which give the same result) gives me a much larger error compared to the other one

Then you're calculating one of them wrong. They should give the same result if you calculate them properly. (I made up an example for myself and verified this.) Show your work and someone can probably tell you where you went wrong.
 
thanks Tom_k - So when I compute cos of theta (the bragg angle which has an associated error) the error in it is just the error in theta?

Even When I put that value in the ordinary error propagation equation, it does not come out equal to the errors in the partial derivatives:

z= B*Cosθ

then error via

Δz= Z* [(ΔB/B)2+(Δcosθ/cosθ)2]1/2

gives a different result to

ΔZ = [ ((δZ/δθ)^2 (Δθ)^2) + ((cosθ)^2 (ΔB)^2) ]1/2 = [(Bsinθ)2 (Δθ)2 + (cosθ)2 (ΔB)2 ]1/2

but either can be used for the error so I am going to use the first equation here...
 
You haven't shown a sample calculation which demonstrates how the two formulas give different results, but I'll make a wild-assed crazy guess as to why they're different. Are you using degrees instead of radians for θ?
 
Last edited:
izzy93 said:
thanks Tom_k - So when I compute cos of theta (the bragg angle which has an associated error) the error in it is just the error in theta?

Even When I put that value in the ordinary error propagation equation, it does not come out equal to the errors in the partial derivatives:

z= B*Cosθ

then error via

Δz= Z* [(ΔB/B)2+(Δcosθ/cosθ)2]1/2

gives a different result to

ΔZ = [ ((δZ/δθ)^2 (Δθ)^2) + ((cosθ)^2 (ΔB)^2) ]1/2 = [(Bsinθ)2 (Δθ)2 + (cosθ)2 (ΔB)2 ]1/2

but either can be used for the error so I am going to use the first equation here...

You must get exactly the same result using both methods.
I will work out a simple example for you.
Say measurement errors cause B to be measured as 19 mm instead of 20 mm
And Cosθ is measured as 0.52 rad (29.7738 deg) instead of 0.5236 rad (30 deg)
ΔB = 1mm = 0.05B ΔCos0 = 0.0036 rad = .0069 Cosθ
Using partial derivatives:

\\ \frac { \delta Z }{ \delta B } \quad =\quad Cos\theta \\ \frac { \delta Z }{ \delta (Cos\theta ) } \quad =\quad B\\ \\ \Delta Z\quad =\quad (B\quad \times \quad \Delta Cos\theta )\quad +\quad (Cos\theta \quad \times \quad \Delta B)\\ \Delta Z\quad =\quad \sqrt { (B\times 0.0069Cos\theta )\^ 2\quad +\quad (Cos\vartheta \times 0.05B)\^ 2 } \\ \Delta Z\quad =\quad 0.0505Z\\

Using other method:

\Delta Z\quad =\sqrt { (\frac { \Delta B }{ B } )\^ 2\quad +\quad (\frac { \Delta Cos\vartheta }{ Cos\vartheta } )\^ 2 } \times \quad Z\\ \Delta Z\quad =\quad \sqrt { (\frac { 1 }{ 20 } )\^ 2\quad +\quad (\frac { .0036 }{ .5236 } )\^ 2 } \quad \times \quad Z\\ \Delta Z\quad =\quad 0.0505Z\\
 
  • #10
Yes I had the θ error in degrees JTBell! oops

Thankyou Tom K, I finally got the errors from both formulas matching!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K