Estimating ln using Linear Approximations

  • Thread starter Thread starter ludi_srbin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentials Ln
Click For Summary
To estimate ln(10.3) using differentials, the derivative of the natural logarithm function is applied, where f'(x) = 1/x. By using the linear approximation formula, ln(10.3) can be approximated as ln(10) + (1/10)(0.3), resulting in an estimated value of 2.33. The method relies on the principle that the tangent line at a point closely approximates the curve near that point. This approach simplifies the calculation of ln(10.3) by leveraging known values and the behavior of the logarithmic function. Linear approximations are effective for estimating values of functions near a known point.
ludi_srbin
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
So the problem says "Taking ln10=2.30 estimate ln10.3 using differentials."

The only thing I thought of doing was to set an integral from 1 to 10.3 with 1/x being the equation I integrate, but I'm not sure if that is right. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is a derivative of a function?

It is the limit

\lim_{\Delta x\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(x+\Delta x)-f(x)}{\Delta x}

So the smaller the \Delta x, the nearer the ratio

\frac{f(x+\Delta x)-f(x)}{\Delta x}

actually is to f '(x).

So solving for f(x+\Delta x) in

f'(x)\approx\frac{f(x+\Delta x)-f(x)}{\Delta x}

gives an approximation of f(x+\Delta x) that is as good as \Delta x is small.
 
Alright, so I need to find f(x+h) which would be f(10+0.3), with 0.3 being change in x. Using my notes...I see that I could make my equation look like f(x+h)=f(x+(1+(h/x))), where I would break it so that it looks like f(x+h)=f(x)+f(1+(h/x)). I would then substitute 2.30 for f(x), 0.3 for h and 5 for x and get 2.33? It worked on the previous problem (which wasn't assingned) so I gues it should work here as well. Thanks a lot for the help.:smile:
 
f'(x)\Delta x+f(x)\approx f(x+\Delta x)

with f=ln(x), f '(x)=1/x so

\ln(10.3)\approx\frac{1}{10}(0.3)+2.30 =2.33

Yep.
 
Look up linear approximations, that is what you're doing.

The idea behind it is that the tangent drawn to a curve is very close to the curve at values near the tangent point, so instead of trying to calculate an imposible calculation such as ln 10.3, you calculate the value of the tangent line at ln 10 for x=10.3. So yea, just as quasar said, I just wanted to give you the name of the process so that you can look it up. :smile:
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K