Estimating proportions using resampling

  • Thread starter Thread starter moonman239
  • Start date Start date
moonman239
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
I just thought of this problem: Suppose Ann holds a bowling competition for Joe and Bob. She has 30 pins. She puts tabs on some pins, but hides them and tells neither Joe nor Bob how many pins have been tabbed. So Joe and Bob decide to make this a fun experiment. Joe steps up, rolls the ball and hits 9 pins, two of which are tabbed. Then Bob rolls the ball and hits 11 pins, three of which are pinned. Two of the non-tabbed pins that Bob hits have also been hit by Joe. Knowing this, how can they go about estimating how many pins Ann tabbed.

My solution: We know that altogether, they hit 18 pins, 5 of which were tabbed. Knowing this, we can be 99% confident that the actual number is 5/18, +/- approx. 19.794239%.

However, I'd still like to know if there's a way to get a better estimate than that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The bowling is essentially drawing without replacement, i.e. from a hypergeometric distribution. With this, the 99% CI is 5 to 15.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top