Estimating the Torsional Stiffness of a 3D Elastic Support

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on estimating the torsional stiffness of a 3D elastic support, specifically focusing on the behavior of a post under load. It concludes that the post is more likely to tilt rather than move sideways while remaining vertical, based on the center of mass (CM) and lever mechanics. The acrylic ring or bushing is identified as a critical component that may struggle to resist tilting oscillations, particularly since only the top and bottom sections are primarily engaged. The assumption is made that the aluminum structure is rigid, simplifying the analysis of the system's behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torsional stiffness concepts
  • Familiarity with center of mass (CM) calculations
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically for acrylic and aluminum
  • Basic principles of mechanical oscillation and stability
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating torsional stiffness in 3D structures
  • Explore the mechanical properties of acrylic and aluminum materials
  • Learn about the dynamics of oscillations in elastic supports
  • Study the implications of center of mass on structural stability
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, structural analysts, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of elastic support systems will benefit from this discussion.

gs00350
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hi,

I am trying to model the configuration seen below analytically in order to determine the natural frequency of the upright post.
The post is made from Aluminium (E=73e9) and the surrounding interface layer is made from an acrylic (0.5e9).

To model the elastic support of the interface layer I am considering using a torsional spring support, but I have no idea how to approximate the torsional spring stiffness of the 3D interface layer. I have tried multiplying the surface area of the interface by the Young's Modulus to get a quantity in N/m (i.e. stiffness) , but this still seems to give me natural frequencies that lie far away from my experimental data.

Is this a legitimate approach? Or is there a better way of estimating stiffness of such a structure?
Relevant Equations
Interface Thickness = 0.38mm
Interface Minor Diameter = 4mm
Interface Major Diameter = 4.76mm
Height of Interface Layer = 9mm
Interface Modulus = 0.5e9
Post Modulus = 73e9
1585301662478.png

1585301781679.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say, being wrong perhaps, that it will be easier for the post to tilt than to move sideways while remaining vertical.
Think of CM (center of mass) of post times lever respect to ring, if the schematic is proportional to the actual thing.
If that assumption is true, then the acrylic ring or bushing would be weaker to resist the tilting oscillation, as only mainly top and bottom sections would be working hard.
 
Well, the first thing to do is neglect the deformation of the aluminum. Assume it is rigid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K