Euclidean Ring of Z[\zeta]: Unconventional Technique

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gonzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euclidean Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the ring Z[ζ], where ζ = e^(2πi/5), is a Euclidean ring. The primary technique involves finding an element β in Z[ζ] such that the norm N(ε - β) is less than 1 for any ε in Q(ζ). The challenge arises from deriving a suitable expression for the norm that facilitates this proof, particularly when coefficients are constrained to be less than 1/2. Participants seek alternative methods or insights to effectively show the Euclidean property.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euclidean rings and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of norms in algebraic number theory
  • Knowledge of the complex number ζ = e^(2πi/5) and its implications
  • Experience with algebraic integers and their representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Euclidean functions in algebraic number theory
  • Study the norm function in the context of algebraic integers
  • Explore alternative techniques for proving Euclidean properties in rings
  • Learn about the structure of the ring Z[ζ] and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebraic number theory, graduate students studying advanced ring theory, and researchers exploring properties of Euclidean rings.

gonzo
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
Let
[tex]\displaystyle{\zeta = e^{{2\pi i} \over 5}}[/tex]
I need to show that [itex]Z[\zeta][/itex] is a Euclidean ring.

The only useful technique I know about is showing that given an element [itex]\epsilon \in Q(\zeta)[/itex] we can always find [itex]\beta \in Z[\zeta][/itex] such that [itex]N(\epsilon - \beta) < 1[/itex] (using the standard norm for the euclidean function).

This usually involves finding a general expression for the norm and then saying that you can choose beta such that the difference of each basis element is less than 1/2, and then showing that this means you can also get the norm less than 1.

However, the expression I got for the norm here didn't seem to lend itself to this method.

Any suggestions on how to do this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
show it has a thingummmy - euclidean function, can't remember the precise name, that might help.
 
Of course, but that's the point. The problem is I can't show the Norm is less than one if the coefficients are less than 1/2 and don't know any other techniques.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K