Euclid's Theorem - Understanding Proofs & Induction Process

  • Thread starter Thread starter nebbione
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of mathematical induction in proving Euclid's Theorem. It clarifies that induction is not universally applicable, as it requires a specific structure, typically involving contiguous numbers, which is not the case with prime numbers. The participants emphasize the importance of a solid mathematical foundation to understand proofs better. Ultimately, the original poster acknowledges their misunderstanding and recognizes that induction cannot be used in this context due to the nature of prime distribution. Understanding the limitations of induction is crucial for grasping mathematical proofs effectively.
nebbione
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone! In this period I'm trying to understand how proofs work.
And i don't understand why the induction process is only used sometimes. When can i use it ?

For example in the euclid's theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid's_theorem
why this could not be proven with the induction ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi. There is no general formula or template for proving something. You can't just take the "induction template" and use that to prove any old theorem.

I am curious how much math you actually know. Because frankly, I think you should focus on learning more math, because with that education, proofs will become clearer.Edit:
Maybe start by reading this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof
 
Can you explain me why i can't use induction always when talking for examples of euclid's theorem ? we only have natural numbers in this context
 
Go ahead. Try to use induction and post your proof here.

Do you know what induction is? Can you tell me in your own words?

Do you know what Euclids Theorem is? Can you tell me in your own words?
 
sorry i re read the induction and the euclid's theorem and now i understand.
You are right.
I cannot use induction since I'm not considering contigous numbers, but thre prime numbers distributed randomly in N.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top