'Euler criterion' for cube roots?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Camila86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Roots
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving Euler's criterion for the existence of cube roots modulo a prime number p. It establishes two cases: for primes of the form p = 3k+2, every element a(mod p) has a cube root, while for p = 3k+1, the existence of cube roots depends on specific conditions. The analysis reveals that if a is a cube, then -a is also a cube, and each cube has exactly three distinct cube roots. The proof leverages the properties of primitive roots and the structure of the multiplicative group modulo p.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic and prime numbers
  • Familiarity with Euler's criterion and its applications
  • Knowledge of primitive roots and their properties
  • Basic concepts of group theory, particularly cyclic groups
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Euler's criterion in number theory
  • Explore the properties of cube roots in modular arithmetic
  • Learn about the structure of the multiplicative group modulo p
  • Investigate the relationship between primitive roots and cube roots
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students studying modular arithmetic and group theory, particularly those interested in the properties of cube roots and Euler's criterion.

Camila86
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am trying to derive a version of Euler's criterion for the existence of cube roots modulo p, prime.

So far, I have split the primes up into two cases:

For p = 3k+2, every a(mod p) has a cube root.

For p = 3k+1, I don't know which a it is true for, but I did a few examples and noticed a couple of things:

* If a is a cube, so is -a
* If a is a cube, it has exactly 3 cube roots

Does this have anything to do with p-1= 0(mod3)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the form p=3k+2, three does not divide p-1, the order of the group, and so cubing the elements just permutates the residues, so every element (trivially) has a cube root.

Now in the case where 3 divides p-1, we have X^(p-1)/3 -1==0 Mod p and it will have (p-1)/3 elements that satisfy it. Proof:

X^(p-1)-1 =={X^(p-1)/3-1}{X^2(p-1)/3+X^(p-1)/3+1} Mod p, and since the left side has p-1 distinct solutions, (the entire multiplicative residue set), so does the other side and thus there are (p-1)/3 solutions to the first part of the right side. All of these can be shown to be cubes. Proof:

Let b^(p-1)/3 ==1 Mod p. b, itself, is a power of a primative root b=d^u. Since d^u(p-1)/3==1 Mod p, and p-1 is the smallest positive power such that this occurs it follows that u/3 is an integer, and so b is a cube.

Each cube has three roots. Proof: Firstly with all elements cubed we know that 2/3 of these cubes are duplicates. Give a^3==b^3 Mod p, either a==b or a^2+ab+b^2==0 Mod p. Here we make a transformation used by Euler: Let x+y=2a, x-y=2b, then the above equation transforms (1/4)(3X^2+Y^2==0 Mod p), thus there is a solution to (Y/X)^2== -3 Mod p. So there is a solution to

\beta=\frac{-1+\sqrt-3}{2} This element represents the cube root of unity and so given a^3, have the three roots: a,a\beta, a\beta^2
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K