Euler, De Moivre and a printing error

2 replies · 1K views · last reply
wirefree
Messages
110
Reaction score
21
to all members of the forum.

In the attached image is equation numbered 3.23 which, by the application of Euler’s Identity - called De Moivre Theorem one line below - leads to equation 3.24.

Above is an a textbook frought with errors - printing ones.

I would be highly appreciative of a confirmation of the veracity of equation 3.24, which to me doesn’t seem logically derived.wirefree
 
Attachments
  • Printed textbook page with handwritten blue annotations showing equations 3.23 to 3.25 for a radiating dipole potential, including a cos/sin expansion via de Moivre's theorem and approximations for lambda much greater than l.
    D8287D21-578B-4F74-9DB6-F88918B00500.jpeg
    59.4 KB · Views: 692
It looks like there's a right brace "}" missing from the 3.24 equation just before the factor ##(r - 1/2*cos(\theta))## as that factor is multiplied against the term ##(cos({\omega*l*cos\theta}/{2*c}) - j* sin({\omega*l*cos\theta}/{2*c}))##

Also in 3.23 it looks like the ##(r +- 1/2*cos(\theta))## expressions are factors in the exponent of e and not a factor against the ##e^{(...)}## expression.

There may be other errors that I haven't spotted yet.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wirefree
jedishrfu said:
It looks like there's a right brace "}" missing from the 3.24 equation just before the factor ##(r - 1/2*cos(\theta))## as that factor is multiplied against the term ##(cos({\omega*l*cos\theta}/{2*c}) - j* sin({\omega*l*cos\theta}/{2*c}))##
No, I don't think the right brace is missing. It's near the end of the following line.
jedishrfu said:
Also in 3.23 it looks like the ##(r +- 1/2*cos(\theta))## expressions are factors in the exponent of e and not a factor against the ##e^{(...)}## expression.

There may be other errors that I haven't spotted yet.
Didn't check this one, so can't say.