Euler-Lagrange Equations with constraint depend on 2nd derivative?

birulami
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
I am reading the book of Neuenschwander about Noether's Theorem. He explains the Euler-Lagrange equations by starting with

[tex]J=\int_a^b L(t,x^\mu,\dot x^\mu) dt[/tex]

From this he derives the Euler-Lagrange equations

[tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial x^\mu} = \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^\mu}[/tex]

which is all well comprehensible. Then he describes how to introduce constraints of the form [itex]h(t,x^\mu)=0[/itex] to form a lagrangian with constraint [itex]L_c = L+\lambda h[/itex].

My question: The constraint does not depend on [itex]\dot x^\mu[/itex]. Is this just to simplify the derivation in this case or would a constraint [tex]h(t,\dot x^\mu)=0[/tex] invalidate the Euler-Lagrange equations? If the latter is true, how would we introduce constraints on the [itex]\dot x^\mu[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is called a holonomic constraint (but it's rheonomic because it's explicitly time dependent). A constraint is anholonomic if it's a non-integrable equation of both the generalized coordinates and velocities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K