I am reading the book of Neuenschwander about Noether's Theorem. He explains the Euler-Lagrange equations by starting with(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]J=\int_a^b L(t,x^\mu,\dot x^\mu) dt[/tex]

From this he derives the Euler-Lagrange equations

[tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial x^\mu} = \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^\mu}[/tex]

which is all well comprehensible. Then he describes how to introduce constraints of the form [itex]h(t,x^\mu)=0[/itex] to form a lagrangian with constraint [itex]L_c = L+\lambda h[/itex].

My question: The constraint does not depend on [itex]\dot x^\mu[/itex]. Is this just to simplify the derivation in this case or would a constraint [tex]h(t,\dot x^\mu)=0[/tex] invalidate the Euler-Lagrange equations? If the latter is true, how would we introduce constraints on the [itex]\dot x^\mu[/itex]?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Euler-Lagrange Equations with constraint depend on 2nd derivative?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**