Evaluate reflectance of an aluminum mirror

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the reflectance of an aluminum mirror using the Drude model. The reflectance equation indicates that for frequencies below the plasma frequency (\omega_p), the reflectance (R) should equal 1. However, the calculated reflectance is reported as 99%, suggesting discrepancies due to model limitations or errors in calculations. The angular frequency (\omega) of light at 500 nm is calculated as approximately 3.77 x 1015 Hz, which remains below the plasma frequency, reinforcing the expectation of full metallic reflection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Drude model for electrical conductivity
  • Knowledge of angular frequency and its relation to frequency (ω = 2πf)
  • Familiarity with the concept of plasma frequency in metals
  • Basic principles of reflectance in optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the limitations of the Drude model in predicting optical properties
  • Research the impact of conductivity and atom density on reflectance calculations
  • Learn about alternative models for reflectance, such as the Lorentz model
  • Investigate the relationship between wavelength and plasma frequency in different materials
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying optics and material science, as well as engineers working with reflective materials and coatings.

mcas
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Evaluate reflectance of an aluminum mirror for a wavelength [itex]\lambda=500 nm[/itex]. Assume that Al conductivity is [itex]\sigma=4.1\cdot 10^7 \Omega^{-1} m^{-1}[/itex]. The concentration for atoms per unit volume is equal to [itex]6\cdot 10^{28} m^{-3}[/itex] and plasma frequency is [itex]\omega_p = 2.1\cdot 10^{16} Hz[/itex].
Relevant Equations
[itex]\omega_p = \sqrt{\frac{Ne^2}{\epsilon_0 m*}}[/itex]
[itex]R=1[/itex] where [itex]\omega < \omega_p[/itex]
[itex]R=\left|\frac{\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega_p^2}{\omega^2}}-1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega_p^2}{\omega^2}}+1}\right|[/itex] where [itex]\omega > \omega_p[/itex]
Note: for some reason frequency on this lecture is indicated by \omega.

I wanted to calculate the reflectance using one of these equations that were given to us during the lecture:
R=1 where \omega &lt; \omega_p
R=\left|\frac{\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega_p^2}{\omega^2}}-1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{\omega_p^2}{\omega^2}}+1}\right| where \omega &gt; \omega_p

I've calculated \omega:
\omega= \frac{c}{\lambda}=\frac{3\cdot 10^8}{500 \cdot 10^{-9}}=6\cdot 10^{14} Hz

So it's less than \omega_p and we should have a full metallic reflection. However, the answer says that the correct value is 99%. Could somebody explain where have I made a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The symbol ω is used to denote angular frequency in radians/second. The frequency f is related to ω by ω=2πf. So the angular frequency of light of wavelength λ is given by:
\omega = \frac{2 \pi c}{\lambda}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mcas
mcas said:
So it's less than \omega_p and we should have a full metallic reflection. However, the answer says that the correct value is 99%. Could somebody explain where have I made a mistake?
If you are meant to be using the Drude (free electron) model, then you are correct.

The frequency of 500nm light is less than aluminium’s plasma frequency (even allowing for possible confusion/error due to the use of the symbol ‘##\omega##’ for a value specified in Hz). So the model predicts R=1.

All I can think of is that the Drude model has (significant) weaknesses. Better models will predict that R is slightly less than 1 due to losses. Perhaps that’s why you are given the conductivity and atom-density - maybe you need to use these values.

However, I’m not familiar with the models so I'm sorry that I can’t help more than that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mcas
Steve4Physics said:
If you are meant to be using the Drude (free electron) model, then you are correct.
The Drude model was the only one we've discussed during the lecture, so I would expect it is used in the solution. Thank you for clarifying this! I'll need to ask my tutor whether we should use something different that wasn't covered yet.
 
If you correct your 2π error, do you get the right answer?
 
phyzguy said:
If you correct your 2π error, do you get the right answer?
\omega= \frac{2\pi c}{\lambda}=\frac{2 \cdot \pi \cdot3\cdot 10^8}{500 \cdot 10^{-9}}\approx 3.77\cdot 10^{15} Hz

Which is still less than \omega_p so R=1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K