MHB Evaluate the surface integral $\iint\limits_{\sum}f\cdot d\sigma$

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The surface integral $\iint\limits_{\sum} f \cdot d\sigma$ is evaluated for the vector field $f(x,y,z) = x^2\hat{i} + xy\hat{j} + z\hat{k}$ over the triangular region defined by the plane equation $6x + 3y + 2z = 6$ with constraints $x \geq 0$, $y \geq 0$, and $z \geq 0$. The parametrization of the surface $\sum$ is established as $x = u$, $y = v$, and $z = 3 - \frac{3u + 3v}{2}$. The computed integral yields $\frac{7}{4}$, which contradicts the expected answer of $\frac{15}{4}$. The discrepancy arises from the incorrect evaluation of the integral involving the normal vector and the surface area element.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface integrals in vector calculus
  • Familiarity with parametrization of surfaces
  • Knowledge of vector fields and normal vectors
  • Proficiency in double integrals and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the computation of surface integrals using the divergence theorem
  • Study the properties of cross products in vector calculus
  • Learn about the correct application of normal vectors in surface integrals
  • Explore advanced techniques for evaluating double integrals over triangular regions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers involved in vector calculus, particularly those working with surface integrals and parametrization techniques.

WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
378
Reaction score
30
Evaluate the surface integral $\iint\limits_{\sum} f \cdot d\sigma $ where $ f(x,y,z) = x^2\hat{i} + xy\hat{j} + z\hat{k}$ and $\sum$ is the part of the plane 6x +3y +2z =6 with x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0,

z ≥ 0 , with the outward unit normal n pointing in the positive z direction.

My attempt to answer this question:

We need to parametrize the $\sum$. As we project $\sum$ onto xy-plane, it yields triangular region R = {(x,y): 0 ≤ x≤ 1, 0 ≤ y ≤ (2-2x) }. Thus, using (u,v) instead of (x,y), we see that,

x=u, y =v , z= 3-3u-3v/2 for 0 ≤ u ≤ 1, 0 ≤ v ≤ (2-2u) is the parametrization of $\sum$ over R (since z = 3-3x-3y/2 on $\sum$)
For (u,v) in R and for r(u,v) = x(u,v)i + y(u,v)j + z(u,v)k = ui + vj + (3-3u-3v/2)k we have

$\displaystyle\left\vert\frac{\partial{r}}{\partial{u}} \times \frac{\partial{r}}{\partial{v}} \displaystyle\right\vert= [1,0,-3] \times[ 0,1,-3/2] = [3, 3/2 ,1] \Rightarrow \left\vert \frac{\partial{r}}{\partial{u}} \times \frac{\partial{r}}{\partial{v}} \right\vert= \frac72$

Thus, integrating over R using vertical slices $\iint\limits_{\sum} f\cdot d\sigma = \iint\limits_{\sum} f\cdot n d\sigma $
$ \iint\limits_{\sum} f\cdot d\sigma=\iint\limits_{R} (f(x(u,v), y(u,v), z(u,v))\cdot n )\left\vert \frac{\partial{r}}{\partial{u}} \times \frac{\partial{r}}{\partial{v}} \right\vert dv du $

$\iint\limits_{\sum} f\cdot d\sigma = \int_0^1 \int_0^{2-2u} (\frac67 u^2 + \frac{3uv}{7} + \frac67 -\frac67 u -\frac37 v )\frac72 dv du $

$\iint\limits_{\sum} f\cdot d\sigma = \frac74 $

But the answer provided is $\frac{15}{4}.$How is that? Where are we wrong in the computation of answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that <br /> \mathbf{n} \left\| \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial u} \times \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial v} \right\|\,du\,dv<br /> = \left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial u} \times \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial v}\right)\,du\,dv.

With your parametrization, \mathbf{n}\,d\sigma = \begin{pmatrix} 3 \\ \frac32 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}\,du\,dv and hence <br /> \int_\Sigma \mathbf{f} \cdot \mathbf{n} \,d\sigma = \int_0^1 \int_0^{2(1-x)}<br /> 3x^2 + \frac32 (x-1)y + 3(1 - x) \,dy\,dx for which I also get \frac 74.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
844
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K