Evaluating Double Integral of ##\vec{F} \cdot d\vec{s}## on Ellipse

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a double integral of a vector field over an elliptical path using Green's Theorem. The vector field is defined as ##\vec{F}(x,y) = ##, and the ellipse is given by the equation ##\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1##. Participants are exploring the setup for applying Green's Theorem to convert a line integral into a double integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to express the double integral over the interior of the ellipse and question the limits of integration. Some express uncertainty about the application of Stoke's Theorem and its relevance to the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the limits of integration and the implications of the integrand being zero. There is acknowledgment of the need to clarify the setup without reaching a consensus on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the integrand evaluates to zero, which influences the relevance of the limits of integration. There is also mention of the original poster's unfamiliarity with Stoke's Theorem, which may affect their understanding of the problem.

jonroberts74
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



##\mathscr{C}## is an ellipse ##\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = 1##
and ##\vec{F}(x,y) = <xy^2, yx^2>##

write ##\displaystyle \int_\mathscr{C} \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{s}## as a double integral using greens theorem and evaluate

Homework Equations



##\displaystyle \int_\mathscr{C} (Pdx+Qdy) = \iint_\mathscr{C} \Bigg(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\Bigg)dA##

The Attempt at a Solution



seems to be I need to use ##\nabla \times \vec{F} = \Bigg(0,0, \frac{\partial F_{2}}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial F_{1}}{\partial y}\Bigg) = (2xy-2yx)=0##not sure about the double integral though, figured maybe this

##\displaystyle \int_{-a}^{a} \int_{-\sqrt{1-\frac{x^2}{a^2}-b^2}}^{\sqrt{1-\frac{x^2}{a^2}-b^2}}0dydx=0##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem is two-dimensional so the double integral should be over the interior of the ellipse.

If you necessarily want to see it as a 3D problem and apply Stoke's theorem, then the surface can be any surface with the ellipse as its boundary.
 
Orodruin said:
Your problem is two-dimensional so the double integral should be over the interior of the ellipse.

If you necessarily want to see it as a 3D problem and apply Stoke's theorem, then the surface can be any surface with the ellipse as its boundary.

this was close to an example in my book, so where is it incorrect?

the book showed taking curl F then integrating over the boundary of the region in the given problem.

I don't know Stoke's theorem yet so I'd rather not try to apply that to this
 
You need to rethink your limits for the y-integral, but they do not really matter since the integrand is zero.

Stoke's theorem (in the simple classical form) relates the integral of the curl of a vector field over a surface with the line integral of the same field along the border of that surface.
 
Orodruin said:
You need to rethink your limits for the y-integral, but they do not really matter since the integrand is zero.

Stoke's theorem (in the simple classical form) relates the integral of the curl of a vector field over a surface with the line integral of the same field along the border of that surface.

ah okay thanks, ##-b \le y \le b## in similar fashion to how x was treated?
 
No, you need to check your algebra when you solved for ##y##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
##y=\pm \frac{b\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}{a}##


##\displaystyle\int_{-a}^{a}\int_{-\frac{b\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}{a}}^{\frac{b\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}{a}} 0 dydx##
 
What is the integral of 0 over any region?
 
HallsofIvy said:
What is the integral of 0 over any region?

It would be zero
 
  • #10
Zero.
 
  • #11
Yes, so there was no reason to worry about the limits on the integral to begin with. That was what Orodruin meant when he said "they do not really matter since the integrand is zero".
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K