Evaluating Fresnel Integral: sin(x^2) from 0 to $\infty$

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Forny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fresnel Integral
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 21K views
Forny
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Somebody could please tell me how to evaluate the integral:

integral(sin(x^2)) from o to infinity
 
on Phys.org
well, I had already checked the link, but I don't undestand the strategy, could somebody please explain it to me?, or if you have a text where I can find some explanation about that kind of process, I would really apreciate if you help me.
 
Forny said:
well, I had already checked the link, but I don't undestand the strategy, could somebody please explain it to me?, or if you have a text where I can find some explanation about that kind of process, I would really apreciate if you help me.

Since [itex]e^{iz^2}[/itex] is an analytic function on [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex] we have:

[tex]\int_{\Gamma_R} e^{iz^2} d z = 0[/tex] where [itex]\Gamma_R[/itex] is the "pizza-slice" countour given in the link.
Now
[tex]\int_{\Gamma_R} e^{iz^2} d z = \int_0^R e^{i t^2} d t + \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}} e^{i R^2 e^{i 2 \theta}} i R e^{i \theta} d \theta + \int_R^0 e^{- t^2} e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}} d t[/tex].

By taking the limit [itex]R \rightarrow \infty[/itex] and observing that

[tex]\lim_{R\rightarrow \infty} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}} e^{i R^2 e^{i 2 \theta}} i R e^{i\theta} d \theta = 0[/tex]

we obtain

[tex]\int_0^\infty e^{i t^2} d t = e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}} \int_0^\infty e^{- t^2} d t[/tex].

By Euler's formula and gaussian integral we get:

[tex]\int_0^\infty \sin(t^2) dt = \int_0^\infty \cos(t^2) dt = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{8}}[/tex].
 
Last edited:
Forny said:
Somebody could please tell me how to evaluate the integral:

integral(sin(x^2)) from o to infinity

Because I'm lazy to write all that much, see pages 98 & 99 of Max Planck's "Theory of Light", Macmillan, 1932 (a.k.a. the IV-the volume of the "Introduction to Theoretical Physics" set).


Daniel.
 
Reviving this tread, but why does

[tex]\lim_{R\rightarrow \infty} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}} e^{i R^2 e^{i 2 \theta}} i R e^{i\theta} d \theta = 0[/tex]

?
 
This is why:

[tex] \left\arrowvert\int_0^{\pi/4}e^{iR^2e^{i2\theta}}iRe^{i\theta}d\theta \right\arrowvert = \left\arrowvert\int_0^{\pi/4}exp\{iR^2(\cos(2\theta)+i \sin(2\theta))\}iRe^{i\theta}d\theta \right\arrowvert[/tex]

Evaluating the absolute value, this equals

[tex] \int_0^{\pi/4}exp\{-R^2 \sin(2\theta)\}R d\theta[/tex]

Now find the maximum of [tex]g(\theta) = exp\{-R^2 \sin(2\theta)\}[/tex] by differentiation (check it's a max by second derivative test).
This occurs at [tex]\theta = \pi/4[/tex].
Then the above is less than or equal to

[tex] R \cdot exp\{-R^2\} \frac{\pi}{4}[/tex]

Take the limit as [tex]R\to \infty[/tex] to get 0.
Absolute value to zero, original to zero.
 
ZZappaZZappa said:
This is why:

[tex] \left\arrowvert\int_0^{\pi/4}e^{iR^2e^{i2\theta}}iRe^{i\theta}d\theta \right\arrowvert = \left\arrowvert\int_0^{\pi/4}exp\{iR^2(\cos(2\theta)+i \sin(2\theta))\}iRe^{i\theta}d\theta \right\arrowvert[/tex]

Evaluating the absolute value, this equals

[tex] \int_0^{\pi/4}exp\{-R^2 \sin(2\theta)\}R d\theta[/tex]

Now find the maximum of [tex]g(\theta) = exp\{-R^2 \sin(2\theta)\}[/tex] by
differentiation (check it's a max by second derivative test).

This occurs at [tex]\theta = \pi/4[/tex].
Then the above is less than or equal to

[tex] R \cdot exp\{-R^2\} \frac{\pi}{4}[/tex]

Take the limit as [tex]R\to \infty[/tex] to get 0.
Absolute value to zero, original to zero.

Buddy you are wrong the maximum of exp(-R^2sin(2thta)) is not at theta=pi/4 its maximum is at theta=0 ! So The maximum of g(theta) = exp{-R^2 *sin(2*theta)} is 1, not exp(-R^2), and this makes you proof wrong.!
Any other proof that is right?
this is my homework pls
 
Last edited:
here is the right proof:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/FresnelIntegralsAtInfinity.html
 
Last edited by a moderator: