Evaluating improper integrals with singularities

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals Singularities
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of two improper integrals, specifically addressing discrepancies between textbook claims and computational results from Wolfram Alpha. The focus includes the concepts of existence, principal value, and the nature of singularities in integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that their textbook claims the integral ##\displaystyle \int_0^3 \frac{dx}{(x-1)^{2/3}} = 3(1+2^{\frac{1}{3}})## exists, while the integral ##\displaystyle \int_0^8 \frac{dx}{x-2}## does not exist according to Wolfram Alpha, which states it has a principal value of ##\log 3##.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the class level and textbook being referenced, which is identified as "Inside Interesting Integrals."
  • A participant explains that the Cauchy principal value is a method to assign a value to an integral that is not defined due to singularities within the interval of integration.
  • Further discussion raises questions about the differences between the two integrals, particularly why one is said to exist while the other does not, despite both having singularities.
  • One participant suggests that the first integral yields complex results for ##x<1##, while the second integral takes real values over the entire interval, speculating that this may be a reason for the discrepancy.
  • Another participant introduces the distinction between Riemann integrability and integrability in the Cauchy Principal-Valued sense, linking to a related discussion on non-integrable functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and evaluation of the integrals, with no consensus reached on the reasons behind the discrepancies noted between the textbook and computational results.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the potential complexity of results and the role of principal value in defining integrals with singularities, but do not resolve the underlying mathematical questions or assumptions involved.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
For two improper integrals, my textbook claims that ##\displaystyle \int_0^3 \frac{dx}{(x-1)^{2/3}} = 3(1+2^{\frac{1}{3}})## and that ##\displaystyle \int_0^8 \frac{dx}{x-2} = \log 3##. However, when I put these through Wolfram Alpha, the former exists but the latter does not, and it says that the "principle value" is ##\log 3##. I am not sure why there is this discrepancy, but it would be nice if someone could explain
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What level of class and textbook are you referring to?
 
alan2 said:
What level of class and textbook are you referring to?
It's a book on integration techniques, called "Inside Interesting Integrals."
 
MAGNIBORO said:
look https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_principal_value
the P.V is a way to give a value for the integral, because is not define if in the interval of integration the function takes values ##\pm \infty##
But what is the difference between the two integrals such that Wolfram Alpha would say that the former exists and has that value, while the latter does not exist but has a principal value of log3?
 
the first integral give complex results from ##x<1##, and the second take real values over the all the interval of integration.
I'm not completely sure if that's the main reason But I remember that in complex integration the P.V Is very useful for finding the value of real integrals by integrating in the complex plane Separating the path of integration

edit: in the first integral, wolfram give a complex value.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+0+to+3+1/(x-1)^(2/3)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K