Evaluating integral born approximation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating an integral related to calculating the scattering cross section for a spherically symmetrical potential, specifically the potential given by e^{\frac{-r^2}{a^2}}. Participants are exploring the integral f(\theta)=\int r e^{\frac{-r^2}{a^2}} \sin(kr) dr, where a is a constant, and are questioning the best methods for evaluation, particularly by hand.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for evaluating the integral, including the use of software like Mathematica and potential transformations to Cartesian coordinates. There are questions about the dependency of the results on energy levels and the implications of approximations for low versus high energies.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to derive the scattering amplitude and differential cross section, with some participants providing detailed steps for integration by parts and the use of Euler's formula. There is an ongoing exploration of the integral's evaluation, with no explicit consensus reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of evaluating the integral by hand as it is intended for a sample exam question, raising concerns about the clarity of the problem setup and the assumptions involved in the scattering theory.

yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm trying to evaluate the following integral to calculate the scattering cross section for a spherically symmetrical potential e^{\frac{-r^2}{a^2}}?

f(\theta)=\int r e^{\frac{-r^2}{a^2}} sin(kr) dr where a is a constant.

What is the easiest way to evaluate this? I was able to get the answer by doing the integral using Mathematica but I don't know how to do this by hand.

Also, is the approximation better for low energies or high energies??
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
IIRC,the scattering amplitude and the differential cross section are given by:
\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=|f(\vartheta)|^{2} (1)

For your potential:V(r)=V_{0}\exp(\frac{-r^{2}}{a^{2}}) [/tex]<br /> ,the scattering amplitude is<br /> f(\vartheta)=-\frac{2mV_{0}}{\hbar^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty} r^{2} [\exp(\frac{-r^{2}}{a^{2}})] \frac{\sin(Kr)}{Kr} dr (2)<br /> ,where <br /> K=2k\sin\frac{\vartheta}{2}<br /> <br /> I suggest u plug the integral from (2) in &#039;Mathematica&#039; and use the result the software gives to find (1).<br /> <br /> Your formula was wrong then.<br /> <br /> Daniel.
 
For small energies scattering ('k' very small=>K very small),the result is very easy to get:
\frac{\sin Kr}{Kr} \sim 1
,and your integral is immediate:
f(\vartheta)=-\frac{2mV_{0}}{\hbar^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty} r^{2}\exp[\frac{-r^{2}}{a^{2}}] dr =...=-\frac{mV_{0}a^{3}\sqrt{2\pi}}{\hbar^{2}}
,where i made use of part integration and the value for the Poisson integral.

So the differential scattering cross section is:
\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} =[-\frac{mV_{0}a^{3}\sqrt{2\pi}}{\hbar^{2}}]^{2} =\frac{2\pi m^{2}V_{0}^{2} a^{6}}{\hbar^{4}}(1)

Integrating (1),u get the integral scattering cross section:
\sigma =\frac{8\pi^{2} m^{2}V_{0}^{2} a^{6}}{\hbar^{4}} (2)
,which should be the answer given by the Born approximation for low,very low energies.

Daniel.
 
I made a mistake in my equation. The correct one is this:

f(\theta)=\int r e^{\frac{-r^2}{a^2}} sin(kr) dr where a is a constant.

This equation gives the scattering amplitude for spherical symmetry.
If I write this as:
f(\theta)=\int r^2 e^{\frac{-r^2}{a^2}} \frac{sin(kr)}{r} dr

\frac{sin(kr)}{r} is approximately 1

f(\theta)=\int r^2 e^{\frac{-r^2}{a^2}} dr

However, this gives me an answer that is not dependent on k. Low-energy scattering wasn't specified.


This is how I did the problem:
The potential is V(r)=V e^{\frac{-r^2}{a^2}}

f(\theta) = -\frac{2m}{\hbar^{2} \kappa} \int_{0}^{\infty} r V e^{\frac{-r^2}{a^2}} sin(kr) dr<br /> <br /> = \frac{-a^3 V e^{-\frac{1}{4} a^{2} \kappa^2} m \sqrt{\pi} v}{2 \hbar^2}

Since \kappa = 2 k {sin(\theta/2)}

\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = |f(\theta)|^2 =\frac{a^6 m^2 V^2 \pi}{4 \hbar^4} e^{-\frac{a^2}{2} (2 k sin(\theta/2))^2}

where E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}

I get the correct answer, but my question is how do you evaluate the integral by hand for f(\theta). I did it on Mathematica but this is supposed to be a sample exam question where we're supposed to do it by hand... the solution says one way to do it is to transform into cartesian coordinates, but I'm confused about how to do this.

Thanks!

YG
 
Last edited:
Okay,let's do it by hand.
U want to compute this function
f(\theta)=-\frac{2mV}{\hbar^{2}\kappa}\int_{0}^{+\infty} re^{-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}} \sin(\kappa r) dr (1)

Let's concentrate upon the integral.Call it 'I'.We can write
f(\theta)=-\frac{2mV}{\hbar^{2}\kappa} I (2)
,where I is given by
I=:\int_{0}^{+\infty} re^{-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}} \sin(\kappa r) dr (3)

Using part integration,we find:
I=\int_{0}^{+\infty} \sin(\kappa r)(-\frac{a^{2}}{2}) d(e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}}) =-\frac{a^{2}}{2}\{[\sin (\kappa r)e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}}]|_{0}^{+\infty} -k\int_{0}^{+\infty} \cos(\kappa r)e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}} dr \} =\frac{ka^{2}}{2}\int_{0}^{+\infty} \cos(\kappa r)e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}} dr (4)

Call the last integral of (4) by J.Therefore:
I=\frac{ka^{2}}{2} J (5)
We need to find J.
We use Euler's formula to get
J=Re(\int_{0}^{+\infty} e^{i\kappa r-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}} dr) (6)
,which can be written as follows
J=Re(\int_{0}^{+\infty} e^{-[(\frac{r}{a})^{2}-2\frac{r}{a}\frac{i\kappa a}{2}+(\frac{i\kappa a}{2})^{2}]} e^{+(\frac{i\kappa a}{2})^{2}} dr =a e^{-\frac{\kappa^{2}a^{2}}{4}}Re[\int_{0}^{+\infty} e^{-(\frac{r}{a}-\frac{i\kappa a}{2})^{2}} d(\frac{r}{a}-\frac{i\kappa a}{2})](7)

In the last integral make the obvious substitution (\frac{r}{a}-\frac{i\kappa a}{2})\rightarrow z (8)
,and u'll be getting
J=a e^{-\frac{\kappa^{2}a^{2}}{4}}Re[\int_{0}^{+\infty} e^{-z^{2}} dz] (8)=\frac{a\sqrt{\pi}}{2}e^{-\frac{\kappa^{2}a^{2}}{4}}(9)

Go with (9) in (5) and get I:
I=\frac{\kappa a^{3}\sqrt{\pi}}{4} e^{-\frac{\kappa^{2}a^{2}}{4}} (10)

Go with I given by (10) into (2) to find the amplitude of scattering
f(\theta)=-\frac{mVa^{3}\sqrt{\pi}}{2\hbar^{2}}e^{-\frac{\kappa^{2}a^{2}}{4}} (11)

,which is just the result 'Mathematica' gives u.So the software is correct.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
859
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K