Evaluating \lim_{\ x \to 0^+} \frac{\ e^{-1/x}}{x}

  • Thread starter Thread starter qspeechc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the limit \(\lim_{x \to 0^+} \frac{e^{-1/x}}{x}\), which presents an indeterminate form as both the numerator and denominator approach zero. The subject area relates to limits and exponential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods such as L'Hôpital's Rule and Taylor series, with some questioning the effectiveness of these approaches. There is an exploration of substitutions, particularly \(u = 1/x\), and the implications of these transformations on the limit's form.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with multiple participants offering different perspectives on how to approach the limit. Some express discomfort with substitutions, while others advocate for their utility in simplifying the problem. There is no explicit consensus on a single method, but various strategies are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the indeterminate form encountered and express concerns about the validity and meaning of substitutions in solving the limit. The original poster indicates a preference for methods that do not involve substitutions.

qspeechc
Messages
839
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement



Evaluate: [tex]\lim_{\ x \to 0^+} \frac{\ e^{-1/x}}{x}[/tex]

Homework Equations


l'hospital's' Rule maybe? Taylor series?


The Attempt at a Solution



Before I did anything, my guess was this tends to 0, as exponentials decay faster than rational funtions.

The limits as -1/x tends to 0 from the right is [tex]-\infty[/tex]
So:
[tex]\lim_{\ x \to 0^+} \ e^{-1/x} = 0[/tex]

and ofcourse the limit of x as x tends to 0 is 0. So it is of indeterminate form 0/0
Using L'Hopital's Rule:

[tex]\lim_{\ x \to 0^+} \frac{\ e^{-1/x}}{x^2}[/tex]

And that is still of indeterminate form 0/0. In fact, you can see that using l'hospital's Rule will always generate an indeterminate form 0/0. Taylor series are no better: after the exapansion you get
[tex]\frac{1}{x^2} +\frac{1}{2x^5} +...[/tex] or something of that nature, point is, it diverges.
Help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at it from the other end of the reals: Let [itex]u=1/x[/itex]. Then

[tex]\frac{e^{-\;1/x}}{x} = ue^{-u} = \frac{u}{e^u}[/tex]
 
You might take the logarithm of the fraction, and try to evaluate:
[tex]\lim_{x\to0^{+}}-\frac{1}{x}-\ln(x)=\lim_{x\to0^{+}}-\frac{1+x\ln(x)}{x}[/tex]
 
try subs x = 1/ ln y and then try L'hopital..
 
thats correct.
 
Thank-you everyone for your answers, but I do not like substitutions, like put x=(...),
is there any way to solve it without the substitution?

Look at it from the other end of the reals:
I do not get this substitution, or any other substitution for that matter! Why, and how, look at it from the other end? Or is it merely a substitution one must use to solve the problem, but has no real meaning. Am I making sense?
 
Making substitutions is a very important tool. You had better learn to love them if you want to proceed far in mathematics.

In the case of my example, u=1/x, the substitution changes an indeterminate expression of the form [itex]0/0[/itex] as [itex]x\to0[/itex] to an indeterminate expression f the form [itex]\infty/\infty[/itex] as [itex]u\to\infty[/itex]. The advantage of the substitution is that using L'Hopital's Rule yields a value.
 
Ok, thank you again everyone, otherwise I would have really struggled with this one!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K