Evaluating Volume of a Sphere in Cartesian Framework

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the volume of a sphere using Cartesian coordinates, focusing on the formulation and integration of a volume integral. Participants explore various mathematical techniques, including trigonometric substitutions, to solve the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a volume integral for a sphere and expresses difficulty in evaluating it, leading to a reformulation using trigonometric substitution.
  • Another participant points out that the argument of the inverse sine function must be dimensionless, suggesting a correction to the formulation.
  • A different participant confirms the correctness of the original triple integral but notes potential errors in the integration steps, providing an alternative evaluation method.
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake in their integration process and seeks further assistance with trigonometric substitution.
  • Another participant shares their successful evaluation of the volume integral, detailing the steps taken and the substitutions used, ultimately arriving at the familiar volume formula for a sphere.
  • One participant suggests that a trigonometric substitution may not be necessary for the final integral, indicating it can be integrated directly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of agreement on the correctness of the initial formulations and integration steps. While some confirm the validity of the original integral, others point out potential mistakes, leading to multiple competing views on the evaluation process.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention challenges with trigonometric substitutions and integration techniques, indicating a reliance on prior knowledge and experience. The discussion reflects a range of mathematical proficiency among participants.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals looking to understand the mathematical techniques involved in evaluating volume integrals, particularly in the context of spherical coordinates and Cartesian frameworks.

billiards
Messages
765
Reaction score
16
I'm trying to sharpen up my maths before I go back to university to start my PhD and am working through Roel Snieder's excellent book 'A Guided Tour of Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences'.

The problem I am working on is how to evaluate the volume of a sphere in Cartesian co-ordinates.

I was never really that advanced in my mathematics, but always managed to pick up the bits I needed. I have made some progress on my own but have got stuck.

So far I have formulated the problem in terms of a volume integral:

[tex]\int^{R}_{-R}\int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}\int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}dzdydx[/tex]

I have performed the integration as far as this:

[tex]\int^{R}_{-R}2\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}} sin^{-1}\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}dx[/tex]

Which may well be wrong, because I have had to do quite a bit of looking around and take leaps of faith to get even just that far!
But now I am completely stumped. I have reformulated this integral by trigonometric substitution to give this:

[tex]2R\int^{R}_{-R}cos^{2}\theta sin^{-1}(Rcos\theta) d\theta[/tex]

Which looks a bit easier to solve, but I really need some help here, I am weak and cannot progress.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi billiards! :smile:

I haven't completely checked your working, but the argumnet of a sin-1 must be dimensionless, so that'll be sin-1√(1 - x2/R2). :wink:
 
Hi tiny-tim,

So you're saying my second equation is wrong?

I suspected it would be because the algebra got quite hairy. I'll go back and have a look.

Cheers
 
Your original triple integral formulation looks correct to me, and when I evaluate this, I get
[tex]\frac{4 \pi R^3}{3}[/tex]
, which is of course the right answer. So you must have done something wrong in the integration steps. the first integration of course just gives z, evaluated at the limits of:
[tex]\pm \sqrt{R^2-x^2-y^2}[/tex]
So your next integral is:
[tex]2\int{\sqrt{R^2-x^2-y^2}dy}[/tex]
This indefinite integral is done with a trigonometric substitution, and the result should be:
[tex]y \sqrt{R^2-x^2-y^2}+\left(R^2-x^2\right) \text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{y}{\sqrt{R^2-x^2-y^2}}\right\[/tex]
When you evaluate this at the limits, the first term gives zero, and the second term, when evaluated properly using a limiting procedure, gives:
[tex]\pi \left(R^2-x^2\right)[/tex]
Now you integrate this with respect to x, and you should get:
[tex]\pi \left[R^2x-\frac{x^3}{3}\right\[/tex]
When evaluated at your limits of +/- R, this should give:
[tex]\frac{4 \pi R^3}{3}[/tex]

Hope this helps.
 
Thanks phyzguy!

I realized I slipped up pretty bad in the second integration!

So I get:

[tex]V=\int^{R}_{-R}\int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}_ {-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}} 2\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}} dy dx[/tex]

Which I am not currently strong enough to do -- hence my slipping up. Can you help me out with the trig substitution I need here?

Thanks
 
Right, I've been away from home but have been dipping in and out of this problem, but I've finally cracked it, so for posterity* here's what I got:

We start with this expression for the volume integral of the volume of a sphere in Cartesian co-ordinates.

[tex]V=\int^{R}_{-R}\int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}\int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}dzdydx[/tex]

The first integration is very easy, it's just:

[tex]\int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}dz = \left[z\right]^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}=2\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}[/tex]

Nothing fancy needed.

And you're left with:

[tex]V=\int^{R}_{-R}\int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}2\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}dydx[/tex]

The second integration got me a bit stuck because you need to use a trigonometric substitution and I'm not too familiar with those. But I figured it out in the end and it really wasn't too difficult.

[tex]\int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}2\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}}}dy = 2(R^{2}-x^{2})\int^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}cos^{2}\theta d\theta = 2(R^{2}-x^{2})\left[\frac{\theta}{2}+\frac{sin2\theta}{2}\right] ^{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}_{-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}[/tex]

But remember we did a trig substitution where
[tex]\theta = sin^{-1}(y/\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}})[/tex]

Which when substituted back in and evaluated gives:
[tex]\pi(R^{2}-x^{2})[/tex]

So now our volume expression is:

[tex]V=\pi\int^{R}_{-R}(R^{2}-x^{2})dx[/tex]

Which is quite an easy one if you've followed it this far. Another trig substitution is helpful.

[tex]\pi\int^{R}_{-R}(R^{2}-x^{2})dx = \pi R^{3}\int^{R}_{-R}cos^{3}\theta d\theta[/tex]

This turns out to be:

[tex]\pi R^{3}\int^{R}_{-R}cos^{3}\theta d\theta = \pi R^{3} \left[sin \theta - \frac{sin ^{3} \theta} {3} \right]^{R}_{-R}[/tex]

Which when evaluated gives me the familiar expression:

[tex]V=\frac{4}{3}\pi R^{3}[/tex]


I hope there's no mistakes in there!:smile:

*In trying to perform some of these integration I found it very helpful to dig up old threads here at PF, so I thought I would return the favour by documenting the route I found for this problem here.

(I think the main reason this took me so long was because I was determined not to cheat by using a programme to help me with any of the integrations, doing this by hand has really helped me to brush up my mathematics and get rid of years of rust, some things I've learned doing this were even completely new! It has also immensely satisfying, although seeing the ingenuity of real mathematicians I've come across in my background reading has also been incredibly humbling.)
 
Looks good! Just a comment - no need for a trig substitution of the third integral, it is simply powers of x, so you should be able to integrate it directly. Remember:
[tex]\int{x^n dx} = \frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1}[/tex]
 
Oh Yeh :redface:

Thanks by the way phyzguy, you give sound advice :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K