Evaluation of Non-Elementary functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter crawfs3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral of the function INTEGRAL[(v^2)*exp(-c*(v^2))] as v approaches infinity. The user encounters an indeterminate form when applying L'Hospital's Rule, which is not applicable due to the product form of the expression. The proposed solution involves recognizing that the exponential decay of exp(-c*v^2) dominates the linear growth of v, leading to a limit of zero. Additionally, the user questions the validity of obtaining the complementary error function (erfc) instead of the error function (erf) in their evaluation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus and limits
  • Familiarity with L'Hospital's Rule and its applications
  • Knowledge of error functions, specifically erf and erfc
  • Basic concepts of exponential decay and growth in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the error function (erf) and complementary error function (erfc)
  • Learn advanced techniques for evaluating limits involving indeterminate forms
  • Explore the implications of exponential decay in integrals and limits
  • Review examples of integrals that involve products of polynomial and exponential functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and anyone interested in advanced integral evaluation techniques and the behavior of functions at infinity.

crawfs3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

This should be a simple problem but l'Hospital Rule cannot be used in this case.

The Problem: INTEGRAL[f(v)dv] = INTEGRAL[(v^2)*exp(-c*(v^2))]. I cannot evaluate this integral at infinity because of the indeterminate form that appears. My partial solution is below.

Solution: When the function above is integrated we get:

(Sqrt(Pi)*erf(Sqrt(c)*v)/(4*c^1.5)) -(v/2c)*exp(-c*v^2) evaluated from x to infinity.

The problem is when infinity is plugged into the term with the exponent, an indeterminate form results. The exp(-infinity) is zero but the v multiplied in front wants to go to infinity. L'Hospital Rule cannot be used because this is a product and the rule can only be used for a quotient. I am thinking of just saying it goes to zero because the squared infinity is inside the exponential which would got zero much faster than the linear v term out in front of the exponent goes to infinity. But I don't think this is a valid way of evaluating something. Does anyone have any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this:

[tex]xe^{-x} = \frac{x}{e^x}[/tex]
 
Indeed that is the way to evaluate the limit. You're reasoning was however not that bad. The exponential function with negative argument is a very strong one. There are not that many functions which multiplied by this one give rise to a non-zero value for large arguments. There are however some...

I evaluated the integral and got erfc (complementary) instead of the erf function. Is this correct?

coomast
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
946
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K