Every open set contains both open and closed cell.

  • Thread starter Thread starter rumjum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Closed Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of open and closed cells in the context of open sets in R^n. The original poster attempts to establish that every open set contains both an open n-cell and a closed n-cell based on the definitions provided.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster presents a detailed reasoning involving distances and neighborhoods to support their claim. Some participants suggest alternative approaches, such as directly constructing open and closed cells using intermediate points.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging with the original poster's reasoning, offering suggestions for clarity and alternative methods. There is an acknowledgment of the validity of different approaches without reaching a consensus on a single method.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions of open and closed cells, as well as the properties of distances within these cells. The discussion highlights the complexity of terminology and the importance of consistency in mathematical language.

rumjum
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If an open cell is defined as (a1,b1) X (a2,b2) X ... (an,bn) in R^n and closed cell is defined as [a1,b1] X [a2,b2] X ... [an,bn], then every open set in R^n contains an open-n-cell and a closed-n-cell.

Homework Equations



Def: An open set is a set which has all points as interior points

The Attempt at a Solution



I am a bit unsure about my line of reasoning. Can someone please take a look?

Let y belong to an n-cell, where y = (y1,...,yn) such that ai<yi<bi, where i = 1,2...n. I can prove that every k cell is compact and that if p,q are two points that belong to the n-cell , then d(p,q) < delta, where delta = sqrt( sum(bi-ai)^2). I will omit the proof for here. But I am going to use this result to solve this problem.

Now, let us consider a point xo = {(ai+bi/2)} , i= 1,2,...n. Now, the distance from the points s (a1,a2,a3...an) = distance from r (b1,b2,b3...bn) = delta/2. Let x0 belong to the cell. It is easy to see this because each point of x0 is between (ai,bi) for i=1,2...n


Hence, I can construct a neighborhood N, with x0 as center and radius delta/2+h/2, where h>0 such that the diameter of this neighborhood is delta+h. This will contain points x, such that d(xo,x) < (delta+h)/2. This N will contain both s and r as internal points. Why? Because any neighborhood around s or r with radius h/2 will be inside the sphere N. Hence, s and r shall be internal points of N.

As a result any point p,q that belong to the cell shall also be internal points of N because the max distance between such points shall be delta. We just saw that the end points r and s are internal points. Hence, if p,q belong to the cell , they shall belong to the N. Note that the greatest distance between two points of a sphere is along a diameter (end points of diameter). That shall be delta + h. So, it will contain any points such that the distance between them is only delta.

Another way to look at p as internal to the spehere is by taking a point p that belongs to the cell such that d(p,xo) = delta/2. We are justified in assuming this because distance of any two points in the cell is less than delta. Let us have a neighborgood N with radius h/2 around p. Then any point m on this Neighborgood shall be inside the sphere with radius delta/2+ h2/ and center x0. (Using triangular inequality). Hence, p is internal to the sphere. In other words all points that belong to cell shall be internal to the sphere N. And N is open because all neighborhoods are open sets. Hence the open set shall contain the open n-cell and also the closed n-cell.

I know it does not sound very precise. But any suggestions to make it better? Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not just show that for e.g. a1 and b1 there exists c1 and d1 such that a1<c1<d1<b1. Do this for all i and consider the open cell (c1,d1)x(c2,d2)x..x(cn,dn) and the closed cell [c1,d1]x[c2,d2]x..x[cn,dn]?
 
That makes sense too. I suppose in a different way, I was trying to prove the same. But putting it so neatly sounds lot better.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, if you talking cells talk cell language. If you are talking balls talk ball language. They are both the same in the end but shifting back and forth just makes things needlessly complicated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K