Evidence that electron is a point particle?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of electrons and whether they can be considered point particles or if they may possess an internal structure. Participants explore the implications of experimental evidence, theoretical assumptions, and the limitations of current understanding in particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that most theories assume electrons and similar particles are point particles, but question the evidence supporting this assumption.
  • One participant notes that there is currently no experimental evidence for internal structure in electrons, nor compelling theoretical reasons to assume they have one, citing the historical context of neutrino detection.
  • A request for examples of experiments demonstrating electrons as point particles is made, indicating a desire for empirical evidence.
  • Another participant argues that while no experiment can definitively show electrons are "points," there are experiments that limit the upper bound of the electron radius.
  • One participant discusses scattering cross sections of electrons with other particles, suggesting these can be explained without assuming internal structure, but acknowledges that higher energy experiments could challenge this view.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of an internal structure for electrons, including the need for tightly bound constituents and the challenge of explaining the small mass of electrons in such a scenario.
  • Speculation about a 'Goldstone-like' mechanism for mass generation is introduced, but one participant emphasizes that without indications of substructure, such discussions may be premature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of internal structure in electrons, with some asserting the lack of evidence for such structure while others highlight the speculative nature of current theories. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on current experimental capabilities and theoretical frameworks, as well as the unresolved nature of certain mathematical and conceptual aspects regarding the internal structure of particles.

jewbinson
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
Most theories (/ when doing experiments we) assume that the electron, quark, etc are really point particles.

What is the evidence for this? I don't think, for example, that experiments at cern convey that they are. They could have an internal structure with a stronger force than the strong force keeping it all intact, for example. Is the point that it does not matter if they have internal structure or not? Or (similarly) that we will never be able to find out if it has internal structure or not due to energy limitations in physical experiments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no experimental evidence as yet that they have internal structure, nor is there any compelling theoretical reason to assume that they do (for example, like most physicists assuming for 25 years that neutrinos existed, before they were actually detected, in order to preserve conservation of energy and momentum in beta decay).

Therefore most physicists assume provisionally that they have no internal structure, except of course for those theorists who are working on string theory and other speculative approaches to deeper unification of particle physics.

All physical theories are like this, by the way. We just don't say so explicitly very often, because it would be tiresome to qualify every statement with something like "to the best of our knowledge, subject to future experimental evidence and/or theoretical developments."
 
Can someone provide examples of experiments that show electrons, photons, etc as point particles.
 
No experiment can really show they are "points" since points have no physical extent. There are experiments which limit the upper bound of the electron radius though. I'm sure you can find those.
 
1) All scattering cross sections of electrons with some other stuff (positrons, protons, ...) can be explained using theoretical models (QED, ...) where electrons do not have any internal structure. Of course this may be due to the limited energy range and could be proven wrong at (much) higher energies, but ...

2) ... if electrons have an internal structure then they must be bound VERY tightly (b/c otherwise it would have been possible to break them in constituents; b/c of the tininess
of the electrons one would expect that an electron as bound state would have VERY large mass, so in addition to the problem of the electron as a bound state one has to face to problem to explain its small mass; that could e.g. be due to an unknown 'Goldstone-like" mechanism for a spontaneously broken symmetry which creates massles fermions instead of bosons.

I think that all this is highly speculative; as long as there are no indications for a substructure in the sense of 1) we should not care about 2)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K