PeterDonis
Mentor
- 49,266
- 25,314
pinball1970 said:I assumed he published his papers then put out a pop Science book to make some of the ideas accessable to the general reader as Hawking did.
And if your assumption is correct, then there will be published peer-reviewed papers by him that can be used as references. That doesn't change the fact that his pop science book is not a valid PF reference.
pinball1970 said:It was more of an invite for someone to explain what the papers were outlining and what the current experimental data has done to support or refute them.
And if you can reference particular papers, then that is a valid subject for discussion. But his pop science book is still not.