Exercise involving Dirac fields and Fermionic commutation relations

snypehype46
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Derive a similar equation for fermions
Relevant Equations
$$\psi(x) = \sum_s \int d\tilde{q} \left(a_s(q) u(q,s) e^{-iq \cdot x}+ b_s^\dagger(q) v(q,s) e^{iq \cdot x}\right)$$
I'm trying to the following exercise:
1620037584475.png

I've proven the first part and now I'm trying to do the same thing for fermions.
The formulas for the mode expansions are:
1620037669696.png


What I did was the following:

$$\begin{align*}
\sum_s \int d\tilde{q} \left(a_s(q) u(q,s) e^{-iq \cdot x}+ b_s^\dagger(q) v(q,s) e^{iq \cdot x}\right)|p,r\rangle = \\
\sum_s \int d\tilde{q} u(q,s) e^{-iq \cdot x} a_s(q) a^\dagger_r(p)|0\rangle +
\\ \sum_s \int d\tilde{q} v(q,s) e^{iq \cdot x} b_s^\dagger(q) b_r^\dagger(p) |0\rangle \\=
\sum_s \int d\tilde{q} u(q,s) e^{-iq \cdot x} \left( \delta_{rs} \delta(q-p) - a_r^\dagger(p)a_s(q)\right)|0\rangle + \\
\sum_s \int d\tilde{q} v(q,s) e^{iq \cdot x} b_s^\dagger(q) b_r^\dagger(p) |0\rangle
\end{align*}
$$

In the first the integral and the sum vanish because the kronecker delta and the delta function pick out a specific value of q and s.
Then taking multiplying from the left by ##\langle 0 |## we get:

$$u(p,s)e^{-ip\cdot x} \langle 0 | 0 \rangle + 0 = u(p,s)e^{-ip\cdot x}$$

where for the first term I've used the fact an annihilation operators gives zero acting on the vacuum and for the second term I've used the fact that:

$$\left(\langle 0 |b_s(q)\right)^\dagger = 0$$

Is this the correct way of proceeding? One thing I'm unsure is what I did for the writing of the state ##|p,r\rangle## is correct, because as you can see I "created" the state using two different operators in the same line: ##a_r^\dagger(p,r) |0 \rangle## and ##b_r^\dagger(p,r) |0 \rangle##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snypehype46 said:
Homework Statement:: Derive a similar equation for fermions
Relevant Equations:: $$\psi(x) = \sum_s \int d\tilde{q} \left(a_s(q) u(q,s) e^{-iq \cdot x}+ b_s^\dagger(q) v(q,s) e^{iq \cdot x}\right)$$

I'm trying to the following exercise:
View attachment 282408
I've proven the first part and now I'm trying to do the same thing for fermions.
The formulas for the mode expansions are:
View attachment 282409

What I did was the following:

$$\begin{align*}
\sum_s \int d\tilde{q} \left(a_s(q) u(q,s) e^{-iq \cdot x}+ b_s^\dagger(q) v(q,s) e^{iq \cdot x}\right)|p,r\rangle = \\
\sum_s \int d\tilde{q} u(q,s) e^{-iq \cdot x} a_s(q) a^\dagger_r(p)|0\rangle +
\\ \sum_s \int d\tilde{q} v(q,s) e^{iq \cdot x} b_s^\dagger(q) b_r^\dagger(p) |0\rangle \\=
\sum_s \int d\tilde{q} u(q,s) e^{-iq \cdot x} \left( \delta_{rs} \delta(q-p) - a_r^\dagger(p)a_s(q)\right)|0\rangle + \\
\sum_s \int d\tilde{q} v(q,s) e^{iq \cdot x} b_s^\dagger(q) b_r^\dagger(p) |0\rangle
\end{align*}
$$

In the first the integral and the sum vanish because the kronecker delta and the delta function pick out a specific value of q and s.
Then taking multiplying from the left by ##\langle 0 |## we get:

$$u(p,s)e^{-ip\cdot x} \langle 0 | 0 \rangle + 0 = u(p,s)e^{-ip\cdot x}$$

where for the first term I've used the fact an annihilation operators gives zero acting on the vacuum and for the second term I've used the fact that:

$$\left(\langle 0 |b_s(q)\right)^\dagger = 0$$

Is this the correct way of proceeding? One thing I'm unsure is what I did for the writing of the state ##|p,r\rangle## is correct, because as you can see I "created" the state using two different operators in the same line: ##a_r^\dagger(p,r) |0 \rangle## and ##b_r^\dagger(p,r) |0 \rangle##.
It's not quite right. You have to consider the effect of ##\psi## and its adjoint on both a fermion and an anti-fermion state (so essentially, you need four calculations). The fermion state is ##|p,r \rangle = a_r^\dagger(p,r) |0\rangle ## whereas the antifermion state is ##|p,r \rangle = b_r^\dagger(p,r) |0\rangle ##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top