MHB Existence and Uniqeness of Finite Fields .... Example from D&F ....

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote : Abstract Algebra ...

I am trying to understand the example on Finite Fields in Section 13.5 Separable and Inseparable Extensions ...The example reads as follows:
View attachment 6647
View attachment 6648
My questions are as follows:
Question 1In the above text from D&F we read the following:

" ... ... If $$\mathbb{F}$$ is of dimension $$n$$ over its prime subfield $$\mathbb{F}_p$$, then $$\mathbb{F}$$ has precisely $$p^n$$ elements. ... ... "Can someone please explain why, exactly, this follows?

Question 2

In the above text from D&F we read the following:

" ... ... Since the multiplicative group $$\mathbb{F}^{ \times }$$ is (in fact cyclic) of order $$p^n - 1$$, we have $$\alpha^{ p^n - 1} = 1$$ for every $$\alpha \ne 0 $$ in $$\mathbb{F}$$ ... ... "Can someone give me the exact reasoning concerning why $$\mathbb{F}^{ \times }$$ being of order $$p^n - 1$$ implies that $$\alpha^{ p^n - 1} = 1$$ for every $$\alpha \ne 0$$ in $$\mathbb{F}$$ ... ... ?(I am guessing that for some reason I cannot explain, that $$\mathbb{F}^{ \times }$$ being of order $$p^n - 1$$ implies that the characteristic is $$p^n - 1 $$ ... ... but why does it mean this is the case ...? )

Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Question 1

In the above text from D&F we read the following:

" ... ... If $$\mathbb{F}$$ is of dimension $$n$$ over its prime subfield $$\mathbb{F}_p$$, then $$\mathbb{F}$$ has precisely $$p^n$$ elements. ... ... "

Can someone please explain why, exactly, this follows?
If $$\mathbb{F}$$ is of dimension $$n$$ as a vector space over $$\mathbb{F}_p$$ then a basis for this vector space will contain $n$ elements. An element of $$\mathbb{F}$$ is then uniquely specified by its coordinates with respect to this basis. Each coordinate is an element of $$\mathbb{F}_p$$, and can therefore take $p$ possible values, since that is the number of elements of $$\mathbb{F}_p$$. There are $n$ such coordinates, each taking $p$ values, which gives you a total of $p^n$ possible expressions to specify an element of $$\mathbb{F}$$.

Peter said:
Question 2

In the above text from D&F we read the following:

" ... ... Since the multiplicative group $$\mathbb{F}^{ \times }$$ is (in fact cyclic) of order $$p^n - 1$$, we have $$\alpha^{ p^n - 1} = 1$$ for every $$\alpha \ne 0 $$ in $$\mathbb{F}$$ ... ... "Can someone give me the exact reasoning concerning why $$\mathbb{F}^{ \times }$$ being of order $$p^n - 1$$ implies that $$\alpha^{ p^n - 1} = 1$$ for every $$\alpha \ne 0$$ in $$\mathbb{F}$$ ... ... ?
This is just Fermat's little theorem.
 
Opalg said:
If $$\mathbb{F}$$ is of dimension $$n$$ as a vector space over $$\mathbb{F}_p$$ then a basis for this vector space will contain $n$ elements. An element of $$\mathbb{F}$$ is then uniquely specified by its coordinates with respect to this basis. Each coordinate is an element of $$\mathbb{F}_p$$, and can therefore take $p$ possible values, since that is the number of elements of $$\mathbb{F}_p$$. There are $n$ such coordinates, each taking $p$ values, which gives you a total of $p^n$ possible expressions to specify an element of $$\mathbb{F}$$.This is just Fermat's little theorem.
Thanks Opalg ... very clear and very helpful ...

... appreciate your help and support ...

Peter
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top