Expansion of positively and negatively curved universe

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Apashanka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Friedmann equations, specifically the equation $\dot{a} = \pm \sqrt{\frac{k}{\frac{\rho}{\rho_c} - 1}}$, and its implications for understanding the expansion and contraction of positively and negatively curved universes. It is established that positively curved space corresponds to a density greater than critical density (ρ > ρc), while negatively curved space corresponds to a density less than critical density (ρ < ρc). However, the equation in question is deemed unsuitable for determining these conditions due to its inaccuracies when $\dot{a} = 0$ and for cases where curvature (k) equals zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Friedmann equations in cosmology
  • Knowledge of critical density (ρc) and its significance
  • Familiarity with concepts of positive and negative curvature in space
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Friedmann equations on cosmic expansion
  • Learn about the conditions for different curvature types in cosmology
  • Explore the significance of critical density in the universe's fate
  • Familiarize with the PF LaTeX feature for effective mathematical communication
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of the universe's expansion and the mathematical frameworks that describe it.

Apashanka
Messages
427
Reaction score
15
From the friedmann equation H2=8πGρ/3-k/a2,
1=ρ/(3H2/8πG)-k/a2H2
1=ρ/ρc-k/adot2
adot=+-√[k/(ρ/ρc-1)]
It is therefore if expansion/contraction is taking place ,
Positively curved space will have ρ>ρc
And negatively curved will have ρ<ρc
Is it the case??
 
Space news on Phys.org
Apashanka said:
It is therefore if expansion/contraction is taking place ,
Positively curved space will have ρ>ρc
And negatively curved will have ρ<ρc
Is it the case??

Sort of. But the version of the Friedmann equation you keep on trying to use, in multiple threads now, is not suitable for answering this question.

Here is the equation you insist on trying to use (btw, it would be a good idea to learn how to use the PF LaTeX feature):

$$
\dot{a} = \pm \sqrt{\frac{k}{\frac{\rho}{\rho_c} - 1}}
$$

The first problem is that this equation gives incorrect information for ##\dot{a} = 0##.

The second problem (which came up in a previous thread) is that this equation doesn't work for ##k = 0##.

So I really don't understand why you keep on insisting on this form of the equation, when it has these problems.
 
PeterDonis said:
Sort of. But the version of the Friedmann equation you keep on trying to use, in multiple threads now, is not suitable for answering this question.

Here is the equation you insist on trying to use (btw, it would be a good idea to learn how to use the PF LaTeX feature):

$$
\dot{a} = \pm \sqrt{\frac{k}{\frac{\rho}{\rho_c} - 1}}
$$

The first problem is that this equation gives incorrect information for ##\dot{a} = 0##.

The second problem (which came up in a previous thread) is that this equation doesn't work for ##k = 0##.

So I really don't understand why you keep on insisting on this form of the equation, when it has these problems.
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K