Expansion of Solids due to increases in Temperature

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the thermal expansion of solids, specifically addressing the paradox of length contraction when cooling a material from 200 degrees C to 0 degrees C. The calculations indicate that the length decreases to 9.99964 mm, which is less than the original 10 mm. This phenomenon is attributed to the limitations of using a linear model for thermal expansion, specifically the linear coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). Additionally, the forum participants clarify the relationship between volume expansion and mass density using the binomial expansion, leading to the formula for mass density as rho = rho0(1-Beta*Change in Temperature).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal expansion concepts, including linear and volumetric expansion.
  • Familiarity with the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and its applications.
  • Basic knowledge of binomial expansion and its mathematical implications.
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations related to mass and volume.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced models of thermal expansion beyond the linear approximation.
  • Study the implications of the coefficient of volume expansion (Beta) in different materials.
  • Explore the binomial expansion in greater detail, particularly its applications in physics.
  • Investigate real-world examples of thermal expansion and their practical consequences.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in materials science, physicists, and engineers involved in thermal analysis and material properties.

jnbfive
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I was given a question about a certain material. The idea was that when it was heated from zero degrees C to 200 degrees C, it would be 10.06 mm from its original length of 10. Doing it in reverse order, length of 10.06 mm from 200 C to 0 C gave me an answer of 9.99964, which is less than the initial 10 mm. The question is, why does this happen. It also lists a description of this paradox given by H. Fakhruddin. I was wondering if anyone had a link or a pdf file that I'd be able to read in order to draw my own conclusions on this.

Another question I was given was as follows:

The volume expansion of a solid or a liquid can be written as V = V0(1+Beta*Change in Temperature), where beta is the coefficient of volume expansion. Starting with this equation and with the definition of mass density, use the binomial expansion to show that the mass density, rho, of a substance can be written as rho = rho0(1-Beta*Change in Temperature).

Now, I looked this up and couldn't really understand what I found. I was wondering if someone could break this down for me so that I can figure it out. I'm assuming that rho = mass/volume in this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Your calculations are correct. The "paradox" comes from using a simple linear model

L=L_0*(1+T*CTE),

where CTE is the linear coefficient of thermal expansion, to describe a more complex behavior.

You can verify the same "paradox" by many everyday examples. If you buy a $100 item at 10% off, you pay $90. Someone who bought it at full price didn't pay 10% more than you did, however, they paid 1(1-0.10)=11.1% more than you. The difference arises from "linearizing" a multiplicative process.

The linear model is accurate for most purposes because the CTE's are so small (the error in your case is just 36 ppm). More complex models are available when greater accuracy is needed.

2) The binomial expansion is

(1+\epsilon)^{-1}\approx 1-\epsilon.

This holds true when \epsilon<<1, so the coefficient times the temperature must be a small number.

To get the result you asked about, substitute your expression for V into rho = mass/volume and apply the binomial expansion.
 
A typo in the fifth line was pointed out: it should read ".. 1/(1-0.1) gives 11.1% more.."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K