Expectation value of an angular momentum with a complex exponent

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of angular momentum involving a complex exponent. Participants are exploring the implications of using exponential functions in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to angular momentum operators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Euler's formula and commutator relations, expressing difficulty in simplifying terms involving the exponential of the angular momentum operator. There is mention of expanding the exponential using Taylor series and the potential to simplify the expression based on known properties of the angular momentum states.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested approaches to expand the exponential and relate it back to the angular momentum eigenstates. There is a recognition of the correctness of one participant's interpretation, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of how to handle the complex exponent in the context of quantum mechanics, with specific reference to the properties of angular momentum operators and their eigenstates.

isochore
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Find ## \langle l, m \vert \exp((a+ bi)L_z) \vert l, m \rangle ##
Relevant Equations
## L_z \vert l, m \rangle = \hbar m \vert l, m \rangle ##
## [L_x, L_y] = i \hbar L_z ##
I am struggling to figure out how to calculate the expectation value because I am finding it hard to do something with the exponential. I tried using Euler's formula and some commutator relations, but I am always left with some term like ##\exp(L_z)## that I am not sure how to get rid of.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dr Transport said:
Taylor series for the exponent...

Ahh, not sure why I did not think of that...

So you can expand starting with the original expression ## \langle l, m \vert \exp((a+bi)L_z) \vert l, m \rangle ##, then since ##L_z = \hbar m \vert l, m \rangle## you can simply compress back into something like ## \exp (\hbar m (a+bi)) ##?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K