Expectation value of Energy Quantum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of energy for a non-eigenstate wavefunction in quantum mechanics, specifically for a harmonic oscillator. The original poster presents a wavefunction, \(\Psi (x,0)\), and expresses confusion about how to proceed with the calculation, particularly regarding the need to express it in terms of stationary states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of normalizing the wavefunction and obtaining the time-dependent form, \(\Psi(x,t)\). There is mention of calculating coefficients \(C_n\) through integrals, and some participants question the complexity of this approach. Others suggest comparing the given wavefunction to known eigenstates to determine coefficients directly.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to express the wavefunction as a linear combination of stationary states. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of coefficients and normalization, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with non-stationary states and the potential complexity involved in integrating to find coefficients. There is also mention of the need for accurate eigenstate forms, which may not be readily available to all participants.

knightpraetor
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm still really confused on how to go about calculating this for non eigenstates. I'm trying to do the problem below, and am wondering how to go about it.


[itex]\Psi (x,0) = A (1-2 \sqrt {\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}} x)^2 e^ {-\frac{m \omega x^2}{2 \hbar}}[/itex]

So I can't calculate the expectation value using Psi (x,) because this is not a stationary state, therefore i have to get Psi (x,t), correct? To do this i need to first normalize the equation and get A, and then plug Psi(x,0) into the equation:

[itex]Cn = \int(\psi_n(x)*f(x) dx))[/itex]

[itex]\psi_n(x)[/itex] is pretty complex for a harmonic oscillator, being
[itex]\frac{1}{sqrt(n-factorial)} (A_+)^n \psi_0(x)[/itex]

having solved for Cn...assuming i can..which i seriously doubt that i can..i could then go about calculating the energy for Psi(x,t). However, i can't honestly believe this is what I'm supposed to do...it sounds too complex, so I'm guessing either i can for some reason just use the Hamiltonian operator on Psi(x,0), or there is some simpler way to get the expectation energy
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Second question..i've noticed in the book it says i can write Psi(x,0) as a linear combination of stationary states. So I'm trying to tell what linear combination this function is. However, i was wondering if anyone had the 2nd stationary state handy. I calculated it but am unsure if it is right..it doesnt' appear to me to be related to Psi(x,0), but then my mind is fried from so many hours of physics in a row...anyways, I'm off to sleep for 3 hrs before getting up to study japanese. I'll probably check back here sometime tomorrow or ask a friend, and then turn in my homework a little late.
 
For your problem, the method with the integral seems rather "oversized" - try calculating the first three eigenstates of the harmonic oszillator yourself with the [itex]a_+[/itex]-Operator (or looking them up in some textbook), then you can see what the coefficients of your [itex]\Psi(x,0)[/itex] must be and determine A. (Remember normalization).
 
so you basically a friend showed me what they did but i still don't really understand how they got Cn for this equation without integrating. I think they set the constants equal to what was already in Psi(x,0), but it was really hard to place all the factors they got
 
[itex]\Psi (x,0) = A (1-2 \sqrt {\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}} x)^2 e^ {-\frac{m \omega x^2}{2 \hbar}} = A (1 - 4 \sqrt {\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}} x + 4 \frac{m \omega}{\hbar} x^2)e^ {-\frac{m \omega x^2}{2 \hbar}}[/itex]

The first three eigenstates are all polynomials up to 2nd degree times your e-function. Knowing this, you can determine the c_0, c_1, c_2 just by comparison.

So I can't calculate the expectation value using Psi (x,0) because this is not a stationary state, therefore i have to get Psi (x,t), correct? To do this i need to first normalize the equation and get A, and then plug Psi(x,0) into the equation

Basically yes, but the important thing here is not the time dependence, but getting the c_n's so you can write your wavefunction as a sum of eigenfunctions, for which you already know that the energy-expectation-value is just their eigenvalue [itex]E_n[/itex].
 
Whoops, didn't see your 2nd posting before I replied. Second eigentstate up to a constant:

[itex]\phi_2 = (4 \frac{m \omega x^2}{ \hbar} } - 2) e^{-\frac{m \omega x^2}{2 \hbar}}[/itex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K