Expectation value of Normal ordered Stress-energy tensor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the expectation value of the normal-ordered stress-energy tensor as presented in Birrell and Davies, specifically in Chapter 4. The expression derived is \langle \psi|:T_{ab}:|\psi \rangle =\langle \psi|T_{ab}|\psi \rangle -\langle 0|T_{ab}|0 \rangle, illustrating that normal ordering reduces to this form due to the nature of free fields where the stress tensor is quadratic. The key insight is that the difference between the normal-ordered and the standard expression is a divergent c-number, which solely contributes to the vacuum expectation value. This principle applies broadly to any operator that is quadratic in fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly normal ordering.
  • Familiarity with the stress-energy tensor and its role in quantum field theory.
  • Knowledge of harmonic oscillators and their operators, including annihilation and creation operators.
  • Basic grasp of vacuum expectation values (VEVs) in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of normal ordering in quantum field theory, focusing on Birrell and Davies' approach.
  • Explore the implications of quadratic operators in quantum mechanics and their expectation values.
  • Investigate the role of c-numbers in quantum field theory and their impact on vacuum states.
  • Examine examples of normal ordering with different operators beyond the stress-energy tensor.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of normal ordering and vacuum expectation values in the context of stress-energy tensors and quadratic operators.

LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi,

In Birrel and Davies ch4 they write:

[tex]\langle \psi|:T_{ab}:|\psi \rangle =\langle \psi|T_{ab}|\psi \rangle -\langle 0|T_{ab}|0 \rangle[/tex]

this is for the usual Mink field modes and vac state. Why does normal ordering reduce to this expression, could anybody point me the way to deriving this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In terms of free fields, the stress tensor is quadratic, so the difference with the normal-ordered expression is just a (divergent) c-number. This c-number is the only contribution to the vacuum expectation value, so you find the expression in question.

An analogous expression holds for any operator quadratic in the fields, as some playing around with annihilation and creation operators will reveal. You can already see how it works for a single harmonic oscillator if you consider the operator [itex]\hat{\mathcal{O}}= \alpha a^\dagger a + \beta a a^\dagger[/itex] and expectation values in the [itex]|n\rangle[/itex] state.
 
fzero said:
In terms of free fields, the stress tensor is quadratic, so the difference with the normal-ordered expression is just a (divergent) c-number. This c-number is the only contribution to the vacuum expectation value, so you find the expression in question.

An analogous expression holds for any operator quadratic in the fields, as some playing around with annihilation and creation operators will reveal. You can already see how it works for a single harmonic oscillator if you consider the operator [itex]\hat{\mathcal{O}}= \alpha a^\dagger a + \beta a a^\dagger[/itex] and expectation values in the [itex]|n\rangle[/itex] state.

Thanks for the reply.

Taking your harmonic oscillator example I think I see what you're getting at:

[itex]\langle n|:\hat{\mathcal{O}}:|n\rangle =\langle n|\alpha a^{\dagger}a+\beta a^{\dagger}a|n\rangle[/itex]

then use [itex]aa^{\dagger}-a^{\dagger}a=1[/itex]

to give:

[itex]\langle n|:\hat{\mathcal{O}}:|n\rangle =\langle n|\alpha a^{\dagger}a+\beta (aa^{\dagger}-1)|n\rangle=\langle n|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|n\rangle-\beta\langle n|n\rangle=\langle n|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|n\rangle-\beta[/itex]

But actuallythe VEV [itex]\langle 0|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|0\rangle =\langle 0|\alpha a^{\dagger}a+\beta aa^{\dagger}|0\rangle=\beta\langle 0| aa^{\dagger}|0\rangle=\beta\langle 1|1\rangle =\beta[/itex]

So we could have wrote

[itex]\langle n|:\hat{\mathcal{O}}:|n\rangle=\langle n|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|n\rangle-\langle 0|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|0\rangle[/itex]

I just need to convince myself this works for an object like [itex]\langle \psi|:\phi^2:|\psi\rangle[/itex] now...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
995
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K