Expectation value of total energy in QM

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the expectation value of total energy, denoted as , in quantum mechanics using the wave function ψ[x,t] = A sin(πx/a) e^((-i E₀t)/ħ). The correct operator for energy is identified as W = iħ δ/δt. Participants clarify that the expectation value is computed using the integral = ∫ψ* iħ δ/δt ψ dx, emphasizing the importance of including normalization factors and correctly applying differentiation rules. Missteps in the integration process and operator placement are highlighted as common pitfalls for beginners in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of expectation values
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanical operators, specifically the energy operator
  • Basic integration techniques in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the derivation and application of quantum mechanical operators
  • Explore the concept of time-dependent Schrödinger equation
  • Investigate the role of complex conjugates in quantum mechanics calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of quantum mechanics, particularly those seeking to understand the calculation of expectation values and the application of operators in quantum systems.

FadeToBen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem asks me to find the expectation value of W.

Homework Equations


The given ψ[x,t] is Asin(πx/a) e^((-i Eot)/ħ).
By QM postulate 2 the QM operator of W is: iħ δ/δt or equivalently -ħ/i δ/δt.

The Attempt at a Solution



<w>=∫ψ*iħδ/δtψ= iħδ/δt 1/(2e^(-iEot/)ħ) sin(πx/a) e^(iEot/ħ) dx

I am trying to wrap my head around what is going on so far. Solving for A in the wave equation would require you to normalize and integrate. You then put the normalized wave function times the QM operator and solve for the expectation value. When solving for position this is no problemo. I hit a snag when solving for W and W^2. I thought that for energy you would be integrating with respect to time, which i was informed was incorrect.
We happened to glaze over this problem in class, but the time term from inside the wave function was brought out to cancel the partial wrt time.

I know that for my above attempt I messed up my U substitution pretty badly. I would just like some clarification on how the treatment of solving for W differs from position.

Thanks ahead of time helping this QM neophyte.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Ben, welcome to PF :)

The idea is that from part 1 of the template a complete problem is formulated. Plus a list of variables, given/known data. In part 2 you provide the relevant equations and in part 3 your attempt at solution. Can't be all that hard.

So you are given the ##\psi(x, t) = A\; \sin(\pi x/a)\; e^{-i{E_0t\over \hbar}}## and they ask for ##<E>## ?

Your relevant formula is ##<Y> = \int \; \psi^*\; Y\psi ## for an operator Y

and the operator W for the Energy is ##i\hbar\; {\partial \over \partial t}##

and your attempt starts off filling that in: ## <W> = \int \ \psi^*\; i\hbar {\partial \over \partial t} \psi ## which is good.

Then I detect a slight derailment:
  • the ##A^*\;A## are missing
  • one ##\sin## is missing
  • the differentiation kind of went wrong. ##{de^{-kx}\over dx} = ## . . .
  • the ##{\partial \over \partial t}## has been moved to the left of ##\psi^*## which is really bad: ##\psi^*\; {\partial \over \partial t} \psi \ne {\partial \over \partial t} \psi^* \psi ## !
and yes, the integration gives an expectation value of the energy as a function of time. The integration is over x.
 
PS the ##A^*\;A## are really useful: look at that expression and at the expression for <E> and realize that you don't have to do any work (integrating) at alll here !

(bit of a spoiler, but a gentle intro into QM is a good thing)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K