Experiment with an Electroscope, a Charged Rod and my hand

AI Thread Summary
When a positively charged rod is brought near an electroscope, the charges within the electroscope separate, causing the leaves to repel each other. If the positively charged rod is then touched with a hand, it likely grounds the rod, allowing electrons to flow from the hand to the rod. This results in the electroscope becoming negatively charged, as the leaves, initially positively charged, will now repel each other more strongly due to gaining negative charge. After removing the hand and rod, the electroscope retains a negative charge. Ultimately, the electroscope ends up negatively charged due to the grounding effect.
MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
We bring a positively charged rod closer to the electroscope what happens if we touch the positively charged rod with our hands and then move the hand and rod away?
Relevant Equations
Electrostatics
I know that if we bring a positively charged rod closer to the electroscope, charges of electroscope are separated and the leaves of the electroscope get away from each other. but what happens if we touch the positively charged rod with our hands and then move the hand and rod away?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think happens ? Bear in mind that "touch the positively charged rod" probably means you've grounded the rod.
 
hmmm27 said:
What do you think happens ? Bear in mind that "touch the positively charged rod" probably means you've grounded the rod.
Thank you.
I think electroscope charge will be - in the end.
 
Why ?
 
hmmm27 said:
Why ?
Because at first, the rod approaches the electroscope with a positive charge, so the conductor sphere has a negative charge and the leaves have a positive charge. when we touch the rod the leaves are repelled and negatively charged, so the distance between them is reduced and after colliding with each other, they are charged with the same charges (both negative charge) and repel each other.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top