Experimental Derivation of the Drag Force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the experimental derivation of the drag equation using coffee filters of varying masses to determine terminal velocity. The relationship established is that the mass of the coffee filter is proportional to the square of the terminal velocity, leading to the equation F_D = 0.5CpAv². Participants clarify that at terminal velocity, gravitational force equals drag force, allowing for the derivation of the drag constant D, which incorporates the object's area A. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the drag coefficient C_p, which is influenced by the shape of the object and the density of air.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of terminal velocity and its implications in physics.
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law of motion.
  • Knowledge of the drag equation and its components, including drag coefficient (C_p) and area (A).
  • Basic graphing skills to interpret relationships between variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the drag equation in fluid dynamics.
  • Learn about the factors affecting the drag coefficient (C_p) for various shapes.
  • Explore experimental methods for measuring terminal velocity in different fluids.
  • Investigate the effects of air density on drag force calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, engineers involved in aerodynamics, and anyone interested in experimental fluid dynamics and the principles of drag force.

koko122
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to experimentally derive the drag equation. I have dropped coffee filters with varying masses and determined their resulting terminal velocity. I plotted the data and found that the mass of the coffee filter is proportional to the terminal velocity squared. I was now wondering how I can use this to derive the drag equation, which states: F_D = .5CpAv2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At terminal velocity the known constant gravitational force is equal to the unknown drag force; equate them and do a bit of algebra and you'll have the ##v^2## dependency. You will also have to do some measurements with a constant mass and different surface areas to trade out the dependency on area.
 
Would you be so kind to explain this a bit further. The graph I obtained is attached.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-08-30 at 7.55.41 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-08-30 at 7.55.41 PM.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 600
At terminal velocity the filter is not accelerating. So the forces acting on it must sum to zero. You know what the two forces are.
 
That's obvious but from the graph that I have provided can I derive that mg=dv^2 where d is the drag constant? Or can I show that the proportionality constant is equal to g/d somehow?

The graph shows the following:
$$ {v_{\textrm{T}}}^{2} \propto m$$
and from this I want to show that:
$$\Sigma F=mg-D{v_{\textrm{T}}}^{2}=0$$
So that the drag force can be defined as following:
$$F_{drag}=Dv^{2}$$
 
So...

mg = .5CpAv2

Your graph is for

v2 = mg/.5CpA

The standard equation for a straight line is..

y = slope*x + constant

but constant = 0

So in this case

y = v2
x = mass m

and the slope of the graph

= g/.5CpA

You know the slope.
You know the area A
You know g

That just leaves Cp.

Sorry had to edit a few typos in this post.
 
koko122 said:
That's obvious but from the graph that I have provided can I derive that mg=dv^2 where d is the drag constant? Or can I show that the proportionality constant is equal to g/d somehow?

The graph shows the following:
$$ {v_{\textrm{T}}}^{2} \propto m$$
and from this I want to show that:
$$\Sigma F=mg-D{v_{\textrm{T}}}^{2}=0$$
I don't see how that would follow using only the graph. It follows from Newton's second law, and that ∑F=0 at a constant velocity.

See C. Watters post #6. Cp is the only unknown in the expression for the slope, so it can be calculated.
 
Ya that makes sense. Would it be correct to infer from the graph that the drag force is equal to: $F_drag=Dv^2$, where D is just a general drag constant?
 
I don't think you can call D a "general" drag constant because D includes A (the area of the object). So it's specific to that size of filter cone rather than cones in general.

D = .5CpA

Had to edit for typo again.
 
  • #10
CWatters said:
I don't think you can call D a "general" drag constant because D includes A (the area of the object). So it's specific to that size of filter cone rather than cones in general.

D = .5CpA

Had to edit for typo again.
And wouldn't Cp include the density of air as well? That has to be in the drag force expression somewhere.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)#Drag_at_high_velocity
we have
F_{drag}=\frac{1}{2} \ \rho_{air} \ C_d \ v^2
where Cd is dimensionless -- and I'm pretty sure depends on the object's shape.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K