Explaination needed for Stoichiometric problem and is Al salt colorless?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yeahyeah<3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Salt
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a stoichiometric problem involving the mass of element Q in various compounds, with potential atomic weights provided. The correct atomic weight of Q is determined to be 19.0 grams, as it is the only option that allows for whole number ratios when the given masses are divided by it. Additionally, the colorless inorganic salt solution is being analyzed for its composition, with aluminum (Al) identified as a likely candidate since it is colorless, unlike the other elements listed. Participants express confusion about the problem's requirements and the interpretation of the mass data. Clarification is provided that the problem refers specifically to the mass of element Q in each compound, not the total mass of the compounds.
yeahyeah<3
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The mass of element Q found in 1.00 mole of each of four different compounds is 38.0 grams, 57.0 grams, 76.0 grams, and 114 grams, respectively. A possible atomic weight of Q is

a) 12.7
b 19.0
c 27.5
d 38.0

A solution is known to contain an inorganic salt of one of the following

elements. The solution is colorless. The solution contains a salt of:

(A) Cu (B) Mn (C) Fe (D) Ni (E) AL

I do not know the answer to this. I know Cu is blue, Mn is pale pink, Ni is green, Co is redish and Al is silver white.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

I know the answer is b. 19.0 grams. However, I'm not 100% sure how to get that answer. I know that it's the only one when the compound masses are divided by it you receive whole numbers. Is that how i was supposed to do the problem? That doesn't make sense to me because other elements could have been in the compound..


THANK YOU :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeahyeah<3 said:

The Attempt at a Solution

I know the answer is b. 19.0 grams. However, I'm not 100% sure how to get that answer. I know that it's the only one when the compound masses are divided by it you receive whole numbers. Is that how i was supposed to do the problem? That doesn't make sense to me because other elements could have been in the compound..
Note that it says the mass of element Q in each sample - not the total mass of the sample!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top