Explaining Bonding & Mass in Chemical Reactions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between bonding, mass, and energy in chemical reactions, specifically addressing how bonds formed between atoms result in a decrease in mass and the release of energy. Participants clarify that when atoms bond, energy is released due to changes in electron energy levels, and this phenomenon is consistent across both chemical and nuclear reactions, albeit with different energy scales. The mass-energy equivalence principle, E=mc², is invoked to explain why bonded atoms exhibit less mass than their separate counterparts, with the mass difference being attributed to the binding energy of the electrons in the bond.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical bonding types: ionic, covalent, and metallic.
  • Familiarity with the mass-energy equivalence principle (E=mc²).
  • Basic knowledge of atomic structure, including protons and electrons.
  • Concept of binding energy in chemical and nuclear reactions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of binding energy in chemical reactions.
  • Explore the differences between chemical and nuclear reactions in terms of mass and energy changes.
  • Study the electromagnetic force and its role in atomic bonding.
  • Investigate the implications of mass-energy equivalence in various physical processes.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in chemistry and physics, particularly those interested in the principles of chemical bonding, energy transformations, and the fundamental laws governing mass and energy in reactions.

jbar18
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
This at first may sound like a question based in chemistry, but I feel it is more of a particle physics question.

When a chemical reaction occurs, it can be exothermic or endothermic. It is my understanding that if bonds are formed, energy is released, and when bonds are broken, energy is used. The explanation that I heard was that when two atoms are bonded, they have less mass than if they were separate, and the extra mass is released as energy, according to E=mc^2.

But why are do they have less mass when they are bonded? Bonds are essentially just the sharing of electrons, right? (I know there can be ionic, metallic and covalent, but they are all based around the electrons) So what I'm having trouble getting my head around is, if you have a couple of atoms flying around, and then they happen to bond, why does that release energy? How can the transition from an electron moving to an electron staying 'still' release energy? And why do two atoms have less mass when they are joined than when they are separate? Heat is just radiation, right? So where is the radiation coming from when the electrons have stuck?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you are confusing nuclear reactions, where these is mass to energy conversion, with chemical reactions. I don't know very much about the latter, but I believe the energy comes from changes in the energy levels of the electrons.
 
mathman said:
It sounds like you are confusing nuclear reactions, where these is mass to energy conversion, with chemical reactions. I don't know very much about the latter, but I believe the energy comes from changes in the energy levels of the electrons.

There is no fundamental difference between the change in mass due to chemical bonds and the change in mass due to nuclear bonds, only the amount of energy involved.
 
QuantumPion said:
There is no fundamental difference between the change in mass due to chemical bonds and the change in mass due to nuclear bonds, only the amount of energy involved.

So what is the theory behind this? Why do things have less over all mass when they are bonded? The idea of having less mass and so releasing energy makes sense to me (well as much sense at it can, at this stage), but I've yet to come across any reason why the over all mass is less.
 
jbar18 said:
So what is the theory behind this? Why do things have less over all mass when they are bonded? The idea of having less mass and so releasing energy makes sense to me (well as much sense at it can, at this stage), but I've yet to come across any reason why the over all mass is less.
All matter wants to degenerate to a state where all mass is converted to pure energy (heat), subject to constraints. One constraint is conservation of baryon number. So a neutron (baryon number 1) will decay to a proton (baryon number 1) because the proton is lighter, and the process stops there, because the proton is the lightest baryon.

Bob S
 
Bob S said:
All matter wants to degenerate to a state where all mass is converted to pure energy (heat), subject to constraints. One constraint is conservation of baryon number. So a neutron (baryon number 1) will decay to a proton (baryon number 1) because the proton is lighter, and the process stops there, because the proton is the lightest baryon.

Bob S

This is the kind of thing I'm looking for. So how does this apply to chemical bonding, where the bond is the electromagnetic force between protons and electrons? As far as I'm aware the proton number in the individual atoms of the molecules doesn't change, so where is the heat coming from when a bond is formed in this case?
 
jbar18 said:
This is the kind of thing I'm looking for. So how does this apply to chemical bonding, where the bond is the electromagnetic force between protons and electrons? As far as I'm aware the proton number in the individual atoms of the molecules doesn't change, so where is the heat coming from when a bond is formed in this case?
It's still the same thing. The mass of a hydrogen molecule is about 4.5 eV less than the sum of masses of two hydrogen atoms. See

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/molecule/hmol.html

So the natural form of hydrogen gas is a diatomic molecule. The molecular bonding energy is probably released as a ~2800-Angstrom photon.

Two hydrogen atoms have a total mass of ~ 2(938.3 + 0.511 - 13.6·10-6) MeV.

Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K