Explaining Gravity: A Simple Question Answered for Kids by an Expert Astronomer

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cookant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that if an observer were floating in space directly opposite Earth in the same orbit around the Sun, Earth would not catch up due to both bodies moving at the same velocity. Gravity is defined as an attractive force between two masses, inversely proportional to the square of the distance, causing acceleration towards each other. The concept of Lagrangian points, particularly L3, is introduced as a theoretical position where an object could maintain a stable orbit opposite Earth, though this position is unstable due to gravitational perturbations from other celestial bodies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with orbital mechanics and celestial dynamics
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian points in astrodynamics
  • Basic concepts of mass, weight, and acceleration due to gravity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical principles of gravitational force and acceleration
  • Study the dynamics of celestial bodies and their orbits using Newton's laws
  • Explore the concept of Lagrangian points and their applications in space missions
  • Investigate the stability of orbits and the effects of perturbations from other celestial bodies
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, educators explaining gravitational concepts to children, and students studying physics or astrophysics will benefit from this discussion.

cookant
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm new to this and trying to explain gravity to a 10 year old ! My question is..

If I was floating in space on directly the opposite side of the sun to earth, in the same orbit as earth...would Earth eventually catch me up ? if not (as I thought everything in the same orbit moves at the same velocity), how would a planet clear its orbit...

I read somewhere about the 'perception' of gravity being that it pulls you down, but if you were an observer in space you'd see it was the Earth accelerating into you..so trying to figure out whether I understood that correctly...

thanks,
Ant.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
cookant said:
If I was floating in space on directly the opposite side of the sun to earth, in the same orbit as earth...would Earth eventually catch me up ? if not (as I thought everything in the same orbit moves at the same velocity), how would a planet clear its orbit...

No, the Earth would not catch up to you, as you both would be moving at the same speed.
I can't answer how planets clear their orbits, sorry.
 
The Earth goes around the sun at 67,000 miles per hour. It will be moving towards you. You can guess how it clears it orbit (splat). If you are moving at the same velocity you will continue (to a first order) to orbit on opposite sides of the sun.

Gravity manifests itself as an attractive force between two masses that is inversely proportional to distance squared. The force between you and the Earth manifests itself as your weight. The force of gravity will cause you to accelerate at 32 ft/s2 (neglecting air friction) if you are falling.

Your weight is the gravitational force between you and the Earth acting on your mass. In fact weight is actually in units of force.

When you jump off a cliff, is the Earth rushing towards you? Same thing in space (ignoring orbital stuff). Who is rushing where is in the eyes of the beholder, but in reality you are not changing the Earth's obit much.
 
Last edited:
Hi cookant, welcome to PF!

For clarity's sake, let's imagine all orbits are circular.

The Earth orbits the Sun at the particular distance and velocity that it does, due to the gravitational force exerted on it by the Sun's mass towards the centre of the orbit(the force of gravity equals centripetal force).
If the force towards the centre were higher, it'd have to orbit at a closer orbit and higher velocity. It could not stay in its present orbit.

Now, imagine you were in the same orbit(the same distance from the Sun) and opposite the Earth. You'd be attracted gravitationally towards both the Sun and the Earth along the same line. This means that the acceleration you'd experience would be higher than that the Earth does(your mass being negligible it feels only the Sun's gravitational field), so you would be inevitably pulled into a tighter orbit.

In a tighter orbit, you'd orbit faster, and after a number of revolutions you'd catch up with Earth. The changing gravtitational interactions would then most likely fling you onto some other orbit.

To stay directly opposite the Earth, you'd need to orbit the Sun at a bit farther distance, so that the higher mass pulling you in would be offset by the increase in distance(gravity falls with the square of the distance).
This point with relation to the Sun and the Earth is called the Lagrangian point L3, and along with the remaining four(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point) is a special solution to the otherwise extremely difficult to solve "three body problem"(i.e., how three gravitating bodies interact over time).

It is also an ustable one, due to the fact that there are many other massive bodies in the solar system, many of which passing by closer than the distance to Earth from that point(which would be over 2 AU).

The perturbations by the many planets in the solar system help clear the orbits, but some material tends to stay around in the more stable L4 and L5 regions. These are called Trojans, and are especially prominent in the case of Jupiter(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_trojan).



As for the perception of gravity, in our everyday experience it's what we call the surface of the Earth pushing against our feet, or bums, of faces should we trip, etc. In space, the largely uniform gravitational field would accelerate you while not producing any sensory reaction at all. You'd be in free fall and feel completely weightless even as you're hurtling towards whatever at many kilometres per second.
 
Last edited:
Ohh, I was unaware of that, Bandersnatch. Thanks for correcting me.
 
To highlight the important point Bandersnatch mentioned: there is a single point on the opposite side where you could orbit , but it is unstable - every deviation from this point (and the exact speed and direction) leads to large deviations in the orbit over time. In geological timescales (millions to billions of years), those deviations will likely lead to a close approach with Earth at some point - either a collision or a significant orbital change.
 
Bandersnatch said:
Hi cookant, welcome to PF!

Now, imagine you were in the same orbit(the same distance from the Sun) and opposite the Earth. You'd be attracted gravitationally towards both the Sun and the Earth along the same line. This means that the acceleration you'd experience would be higher than that the Earth does(your mass being negligible it feels only the Sun's gravitational field), so you would be inevitably pulled into a tighter orbit.

ahhhhhhh! Thank you very much

thanks for the responses guys, this is a very dangerous forum for someone like me with lots of questions ;-) ...I'll be back !

Ant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K