• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Explaining internal energy (A level physics)

  • Thread starter VEReade
  • Start date
  • #1
10
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

I’m having a mental block re. teaching internal energy. Here’s the issue:

For ideal gas, internal energy is entirely kinetic energy. I explain to students this is because there are no interatomic forces of attraction.

Now, a solid...internal energy is sum of kinetic energy and potential energy. The interatomic forces cause potential energy term.

Here’s the issue, work has to be done on particles going from solid to gaseous state. So particles in solid state have less potential energy than when at infinity. Looks like potential energy term is negative. Looks like internal energy could go negative - that sounds bad..!?
Guidance appreciated!?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Charles Link
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
4,589
1,963
The idea of the internal energy being negative is ok. If you look at simple atomic theory, and the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom, all of the computed energy levels are negative. The important parameter here is simply the change in energy that occurs in going from one state to another. What is used as the zero reference energy level is somewhat arbitrary, but in these cases it is the separated particles in a motionless state.
 
  • Like
Likes VEReade
  • #3
10
1
Thanks, that makes sense.

UK A - level physics students used to have to know the potential energy against separation graph. I think it’s been removed from specifications these days - the ones I know anyway. I think this is influencing my thinking as regards teaching internal energy!

As you say, it’s changes in internal energy during , say, phase changes which lead to an understanding of latent heat etc. From a teaching point of view, it is probably best way to approach it...
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #4
James Pelezo
Gold Member
190
57
For academic reasons I find separating energy into three distinctive issues; that is, Kinetic Energy, Potential Energy (or, Positional Energy) and Internal Energy. I must confess that I'm a chemistry professor, not a physics prof, so my distinctions between these energy 'types' is chemistry oriented. Here's my definitions and examples ...
Kinetic Energy is the mechanical energy of motion, Potential energy is mechanical stored energy and Internal energy is the energy content of a system due to its state of existence and chemical structure. That is, state of existence meaning solid, liquid or gas and chemical structure meaning the substances molecular geometry. This is generally a macro molecular interpretation as opposed to a kinetic micro molecular particle level interpretations, but does give a more physical illustration of changes in internal energy.

Consider Water (good old H2O)... It can exist as solid (ice), liquid (water) or gas (steam) but its chemical structure is always bent angular with two covalent bond and two non-bonded pair of electrons around the central element oxygen. To change the structure would be to change the molecule and the internal energy of water that supports this structural configuration.

243409

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...TiAhXlmq0KHUmSCFAQ7Al6BAgJEA0&biw=1536&bih=722

Typically, for chemical reactions, changes in internal energy is calculated from the 1st Law equation ΔURxn = Heat of Reaction (q) + Work of Rxn (w) = ΔHRxn + Pressure(P)⋅ΔMolar Volume of gasses (V), or simply ΔU = ΔH + P⋅ΔVm.

Heat of Reaction (or, Enthalpy of Rxn) can be calculated using the Hess's Law Equation ΔHRxn = Σn⋅ΔHfo(Products) - Σn⋅ΔHfo(Reactants) which shows a clear differential numerically in energy content.

Work of Reaction depends upon changes in molar volumes of gasses (ΣVm(products) - ΣVm(reactants). If ΔVm > 0 => work is exothermic expansion and is subtracted from the Heat of Reaction; if ΔVm < 0 => work is endothermic compression and is added to the Heat of Reaction and if If ΔVm = 0 => work is isothermic (w = 0) and ΔURxn = ΔHRxn.

Example (Open System, ΔVm ≠ 0)
3H2(g) + N2(g) => 2NH3(g); ΔHRxn = -91.8 Kj
The reaction shows 4Vm(reactants) → 2Vm(products) => decrease in 2Vm net change in molar volume and is a compression reaction. Therefore, work is endothermic (w > 0 ) ~ +5.0 Kj. Therefore, the change in Internal Energy (ΔU) = ΔH + P⋅ΔVm = -91.8Kj + (+5.0Kj) = -86.8Kj (net).
Considering structural differences between reactants and products, one can see a clear difference in structure between H - H and O=O giving a pyramidal structure for gaseous ammonia. That is, the internal energy of ammonia is 91.8Kj less than the internal energy of H2(g) and O2(g).

243410

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...0.534.10......1....1..gws-wiz-img.xzAEwcWMe5g
Clearly different structure than H - H and O = O and thus different internal energy holding the structure in a pyramidal geometry.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes sysprog

Related Threads on Explaining internal energy (A level physics)

Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
290
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
848
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
Top