Explaining Logical Implication: "If P Then Q

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsuser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    implication
physicsuser
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
Can someone try and explain it to me?
I cannot understand the meaning of implication ( if p then q) from truth table

p q p => q
t t t
t f f
f t t
f f t


so it is if p is true then q is true or if p is false then q is false?

then why if p is false and q is true, p implies q is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If p is false, q can be either true or false, therefore p=>q remains true. The only case where it is contradicted is p true and q false.
 
This is one I have to explain a lot to new students. Here's the example that I find useful.

P is the statement 'n is divisible by 4'
Q is the statement 'n is even'

We can all agree that the proposition 'If P then Q ' is true, yep?

But n=6 is a case where P is false and Q is true.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top