Explaining Pythagoras' Theorem & Its Impact on Acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Pythagoras' Theorem, specifically in the context of Minkowski space, governs the relationship between mass, length, and time in accelerated bodies. The theorem is expressed as s² = t² - x² - y² - z², which allows for the calculation of the "true" elapsed time in one spatial dimension as s² = t² - x² = t²*(1-v²). This formulation leads to the concept of relativistic mass as the time component of the Energy-Momentum vector, where modern terminology favors energy over relativistic mass. Additionally, the understanding of length contraction is clarified as a one-dimensional slice of a two-dimensional entity, challenging traditional definitions of length.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski space and its implications in physics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of relativistic mass and energy
  • Knowledge of vector mathematics and its application in physics
  • Basic comprehension of Pythagorean Theorem in both Euclidean and non-Euclidean contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Minkowski space in modern physics
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Energy-Momentum vector
  • Explore the concept of time dilation and its relation to relativistic effects
  • Investigate the differences between Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining advanced concepts, and researchers interested in the intersection of geometry and relativity.

D.A.Peel
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain to me why Pythagoras' Theorem governs the rate of change, of mass, length and time within accelertated bodies?
It's a simple theorem learned by most children by the age of eleven, so one would expect the answer to this question to be quite simple as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's actually not the well-known theorem of Euclidean space, but a different version belonging to Minkowski space, where the length of a vector (e.g. a time interval) is calculated from its components using
s² = t² - x² - y² - z². (or -t² + x² + y² + z² as a matter of convention)
In one spatial dimension, this becomes
s² ("true" elapsed time) = t² - x² = t²*(1-v²) (less than elapsed coordinate time).
The same logic gives relativistic mass: it is the "time component" of a vector (Energy-Momentum vector) which has a length equal to the rest mass. Modern usage is to call the time component energy, not relativistic mass.
It's a different situation for length contraction: what we define as "length" is actually not a component of a vector, but a one-dimensional slice of a two-dimensional entity, the measuring rod, which extends both in space and in time. Therefore the different result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
Replies
29
Views
4K