Explaining usefullness of displacement and velocity

AI Thread Summary
Displacement and velocity are crucial concepts in real-world applications, particularly in navigation and physics. While cars measure distance traveled, understanding displacement can provide a more accurate position on a map without GPS. In aviation and maritime contexts, knowing velocity, which includes direction, is essential for navigation and safety. Everyday examples, such as a track athlete's run or a trip into the city, illustrate the difference between distance and displacement, as well as speed and velocity. Ultimately, these concepts are vital for predicting outcomes in various scenarios, including physics calculations and navigation systems.
supernova88
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
I know the difference between distance and displacement, and speed and velocity, but I'm struggling how to explain the usefulness of displacement and velocity in the real world? For instance, our cars count the distances they travel, not displacement as one might see on a map, while airplanes plot their paths according to the distances they cover flying over the Earth's surface, not the displacement from one city to the next as if you drew a straight line through the crust. Similarly, if I told someone how fast I travel from one city to the next (whether driving or flying or whatever) based on velocity rather than speed, my answer may seem ridiculously slow or wildly fast depending on how much displacement I cover in some time versus the actual distance of my route. What's an easy way to explain, then, the reason we bother having displacement and velocity in the first place and some good examples where they make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cars cannot measure the displacement directly, but it would be really useful if they could - you could know your position on the map without needing GPS.
In an airplane (or a ship), knowing the speed is nice, but you are also interested in the direction - you have to find the velocity, and you have to keep track of displacement to know where you are (again, GPS made that easier).

The same is true for nearly everything else that is not bound to roads, rails, canals or similar. You have to know the direction of its current motion/total displacement.

Subtracting two speeds often gives a wrong answer if you are interested in relative motion - you have to take the velocities. And so on.
 
supernova88 said:
I'm struggling how to explain the usefulness of displacement and velocity in the real world?
What do you mean by "in the real world"? Physics is done in the real world. Displacement and velocity are used extensively in physics. Displacement is used to calculate work and energy used. Velocity is used to calculate momentum and predict outcome of collisions.

If you mean a device that captures displacement / velocity, like odometers / speedometers capture distance / speed, then I guess an inertial navigation system is the closest example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_navigation_system
 
To be more specific, A.T., I'm trying to explain displacement/velocity to people who've never heard of them before. Because these kids don't yet know anything about energy and work, I'm trying to keep things simple, but I'm struggling to find everyday examples to point to. I could, for instance, say that the distance and displacement a track athlete runs are different depending on where he/she stars and finishes, or the velocity of one's trip from home into the city is different than the actual speeds they experience on the road. I guess I'm just trying to anticipate the part where the kids ask why anyone would care or need to know displacement or velocity. After all, we don't measure gas usage in displacement, or we don't drive negative 65 mph when we turn around and go home. Are there any cases, aside from when distance/displacement or speed/velocity happen to be the same thing (i.e. driving in a straight line), where it's important to know displacement and velocity?
 
supernova88 said:
Are there any cases, aside from when distance/displacement or speed/velocity happen to be the same thing (i.e. driving in a straight line), where it's important to know displacement and velocity?
Cue sports?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cue_sports
 
Hmmmm, good one
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top