Explaining Wave Equation Solution for Vibrating Strings

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the assumptions made in deriving the governing equation for a vibrating string, particularly regarding the tension force on particles of the string. It is assumed that the tension is constant and that the transverse component of tension is proportional to the ratio of vertical to horizontal displacement, leading to the approximation T sinθ ≈ T Δy/Δx for small angles. The participants explore the implications of assuming uniform density and tension, noting that while non-uniform tension could be considered if solutions do not match reality, it complicates the mathematics significantly. The justification for assuming uniform tension lies in its ability to yield simple solutions that align with observed behavior. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the balance between theoretical assumptions and practical outcomes in scientific modeling.
mahdert
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
In deriving the governing equation for a vibrating string, there are several assumptions that are made. One of the assumptions that I had a hard time understanding was the following.

Once the string is split into n particles, the force of tension on each particle from the particles in the right and the left is assumed to be proportional to the ratio of the vertical displacement to the horizontal displacement.

Could you please explain to me how this assumption is correct. What are the reasons behind it. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mahdert said:
Once the string is split into n particles, the force of tension on each particle from the particles in the right and the left is assumed to be proportional to the ratio of the vertical displacement to the horizontal displacement.
Generally, one assumes that the tension is constant throughout the string. You need the transverse component of the tension--which is the restoring force tending to pull the string back to its equilibrium position. At any point, the string makes some angle θ. The transverse component of the tension = T sinθ, which for small angles ≈ T tanθ = T Δy/Δx.

(One should derive this, as above, not just assume it.)
 
I see. I can only suppose that this follows the assumption that the string is of uniform density. What if this is not the case? How would one proceed.
 
I don't think the string density would affect the assumption of uniform tension.
 
So what is the justification for assuming uniform tension across the string.
 
You could assume otherwise, but why? If uniformity gives simple solutions that match reality, isn't all you need? It's a hypothesis that works out to be correct, an example of successful science.

Assuming non-uniform tension would be the next step, in the case that the solutions didn't match reality. It would also complicate the math tremendously. First in that you would have to make another guess as how the tension behaves (which function T(x) ?).
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top